Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15310404›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2004

Selection and validation of endogenous reference genes using a high throughput approach.

Ping Jin, Yingdong Zhao, Yvonne Ngalame, Monica C Panelli, Dirk Nagorsen, Vladia Monsurró, Kina Smith, Nan Hu, Hua Su, Phil R Taylor and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Whole blood ratio ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reference genes in real-time PCR.Journal of applied genetics · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ping JinImmunogenetics Section, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center, NIH Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. pjin@mail.cc.nih.gov
Yingdong Zhao
Yvonne Ngalame
Monica C Panelli
Dirk Nagorsen
Vladia Monsurró
Kina Smith
Nan Hu
Hua Su
Phil R Taylor
Francesco M Marincola
Ena Wang

Funding

Immunogenetics of Vaccine TherapyZIACL002115 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MARINCOLA, FRANCESCO M · 2009 to 2010
$0k
Immunogenetics of Vaccine TherapyZ01CL002115 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MARINCOLA, FRANCESCO M · 2003 to 2005
–
UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER GENETIC STUDIESZ01CN000150 · CN · CANCER PREVENTION AND CONTROL · PI TAYLOR, PHILIP · 1990 to 2004
–
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndogenous reference genes are commonly used to normalize expression levels of other genes with the assumption that the expression of the former is constant in different tissues and in different physiopathological conditions. Whether this assumption is correct it is, however, still matter of debate. In this study, we searched for stably expressed genes in 384 cDNA array hybridization experiments encompassing different tissues and cell lines.

resultsSeveral genes were identified whose expression was highly stable across all samples studied. The usefulness of 8 genes among them was tested by normalizing the relative gene expression against test genes whose expression pattern was known. The range of accuracy of individual endogenous reference genes was wide whereas consistent information could be obtained when information pooled from different endogenous reference genes was used.

conclusionsThis study suggests that even when the most stably expressed genes in array experiments are used as endogenous reference, significant variation in test gene expression estimates may occur and the best normalization is achieved when data from several endogenous reference genes are pooled together to minimize minimal but significant variation among samples. We are presently optimizing strategies for the preparation of endogenous reference gene mixtures that could yield information comparable to that of data pooled from individual endogenous reference gene normalizations.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGenesCarcinomaCell LineCell Line, TumorDNA, ComplementaryGene Expression ProfilingHumansMelanocytesMelanomaNevusNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOrgan SpecificityReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsDNA, ComplementaryRNA, MessengerRNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID15310404
PMCPMC516027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.