Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15309549›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2004

Sex differences in the oxygen uptake kinetic response to heavy-intensity exercise in prepubertal children.

Samantha G Fawkner, Neil Armstrong

Abstract readClinical TrialControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Factors Affecting V̇OScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Can We Confidently Study VO2 Kinetics in Young People?Journal of sports science & medicine · 2007
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samantha G FawknerChildren's Health and Exercise Research Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. s.g.fawkner@hw.ac.uk
Neil Armstrong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that there are no sex differences in the oxygen uptake (V(.)O(2)) kinetic response to moderate intensity exercise. However, sex differences in the response to maximal exercise are readily apparent even in the prepubertal years. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate if sex differences exist in the V(.)O(2) kinetic response to heavy-intensity exercise. Forty-eight prepubertal children (25 male, 23 female) completed four transitions from baseline to 40% of the difference between their previously determined T(V-slope) (ventilatory threshold determined by the V-slope method) and peak V(.)O(2) on an electronically braked cycle ergometer. Each subject's breath-by-breath responses were interpolated to 1 s intervals, time aligned and averaged. The data following phase 1 were fit with: (1) a double exponential model and (2) a single exponential model within a fitting window that was previously identified to exclude the slow component. There were no significant differences in the parameters of the primary component between each model. Subsequent analysis was carried out using model 2. The primary time constant (tau(1)) was significantly (P<0.05) faster in boys [17.6 (5.8) s] than girls [21.9 (8.2) s], and the slow component contribution to the total change in amplitude after 9 min was significantly greater in girls [11.8 (5.5)%] than boys [8.9 (3.7)%]. Sex differences in the kinetic response to heavy-intensity exercise were identified and suggest that during the prepubertal years, sex differences exist in the ability to deliver and/or utilise oxygen in children.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalChildComputer SimulationFemaleHumansKineticsMaleOxygenOxygen ConsumptionPhysical EndurancePhysical ExertionPubertySex FactorsOxygen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.