Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15308882›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2004

The JNC 7 approach compared to conventional treatment in diabetic patients with hypertension: a double-blind trial of initial monotherapy vs. combination therapy.

Jonathan C Fox, Kellie Leight, Santosh C Sutradhar, Laura A Demopoulos, Gilbert W Gleim, Andrew J Lewin, George L Bakris

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00480805 (HYZAAR Versus Ramipril Diabetic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00480805 phase3completednot on this map

HYZAAR Versus Ramipril Diabetic Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorOrganon and CoRan2001 to 2002Enrolled312ConditionsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus, HypertensionArmsMK0954A, losartan potassium (+) hydrochlorothiazide (HYZAAR) / Duration of Treatment : 8 Weeks, Comparator : ramipril /Duration of Treatment : 8 Weeks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan C FoxMerck Research Laboratories, BLX-21, P.O. Box 4, West Point, PA 19486, USA.
Kellie Leight
Santosh C Sutradhar
Laura A Demopoulos
Gilbert W Gleim
Andrew J Lewin
George L Bakris
United States Military Academy · USNational Research Institute · USRush University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The JNC 7 states that persons with blood pressure (BP) more than 20/10 mm Hg above goal should be started on combination drug therapy. This criterion includes patients with BP >160/100 mm Hg and diabetics with hypertension. The goal BP for persons with diabetes mellitus is <130/80 mm Hg. A randomized, double-blind trial force titrated initial combination therapy utilizing an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) combination (losartan/hydrochlorothiazide [LOS/HCTZ]) compared with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ramipril), for 8 weeks, and tested the hypothesis that combination therapy is more likely to achieve goal BP vs. monotherapy. At 4 weeks, 30.5% of LOS/HCTZ and 14.4% of ramipril recipients achieved goal diastolic BP (p<0.001). More participants achieved goal systolic BP in the ARB/HCTZ group at 4 weeks (29.8% vs. 14.4%; p<0.001). At 4 weeks, mean diastolic BP had decreased 10.2+/-7.4 mm Hg in the LOS/HCTZ group compared with 6.4+/-6.8 mm Hg in the ramipril group (p<0.001), and systolic BP had fallen 15.4+/-13.1 mm Hg in the ARB/HCTZ compared with 9.2+/-10.2 mm Hg in the ACE-inhibitor group (p<0.001). Significant differences favoring the combination were also noted at 8 weeks. Drug-related adverse experiences were 10.3% for the combination compared with 12.7% for the monotherapy group. Initial combination therapy with an ARB/HCTZ was more effective than ACE-inhibitor monotherapy in achieving BP goals in participants with diabetes with no significant differences in the incidence of adverse experiences. These observations confirm other studies of combination therapies, such as b blocker/diuretic, ACE inhibitor/diuretic, or ACE inhibitor/calcium channel blocker. The use of two medications will achieve goal BP in more patients than monotherapy. This observation is important in treatment of high-risk patients with diabetes.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsChi-Square DistributionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Double-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHydrochlorothiazideHypertensionLosartanMaleMiddle AgedRamiprilTreatment OutcomeAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsHydrochlorothiazideLosartanRamipril

Identifiers

PMID15308882
PMCPMC8109344
OpenAlexW2070447691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.