ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine
Screening, supplements and the use of hormonal replacement therapy in postmenopausal women in a family medicine department prior to the publication of the Woman's Health Initiative report.
Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The present and the future of breast cancer burden in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany guidelines and recommendations exist on the management of the menopause. Because it is not certain what women do or what management they receive in practice, we studied what was prescribed for postmenopausal women and what screening they had undergone. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on all postmenopausal women between the ages of 56-59 years who had no absolute contraindications to taking hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) and were frequent enough attendees at the family health clinic to ensure that postmenopausal issues had been addressed and screening and follow up performed. The women were patients of the family medicine department at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia.
resultsSixty-one percent had taken HRT at some time after the menopause, including 42% of Saudis and 87% of non-Saudis. Forty-six percent of all women were taking HRT at the time of the study, including 30% of Saudis and 70% of non-Saudis. Fifty-one percent of all women were taking calcium supplements, 49% were taking vitamin D supplementation, and 63% had undergone a bone mineral density evaluation. There were notable differences in percentages between Saudis and non-Saudis. Sixteen percent of all women had never had a mammogram, including 26% of Saudis and only 3% of non-Saudis.
conclusionMany postmenopausal women with access to medical care were not screened nor were they taking supplements in accordance with published guidelines. There was a discrepancy in the management of Saudi and non-Saudi women that could be explained partially by the high percentage of medical professionals among non-Saudi women who are more likely to actively seek medical attention. Our study showed a large proportion of women on HRT, the standard of care before the publication of the Women's Health Initiative study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.