ReviewAnnals of Saudi medicine
Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular pathology.
Review in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- 6q deletion is frequent but unrelated to patient prognosis in breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Article
- Article
- Malignant ascite-derived extracellular vesicles inhibit T cell activity by upregulating Siglec-10 expression.Cancer management and research · 2019Article
- p16 overexpression and 9p21 deletion are linked to unfavorable tumor phenotype in breast cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Virtual microscopy as an enabler of automated/quantitative assessment of protein expression in TMAs.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2008Review
- Tissue Microarray: A rapidly evolving diagnostic and research tool.Annals of Saudi medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern research technologies, including DNA, protein, and antibody microarrays identify a steadily growing number of clues that are useful in molecular disease classification, drug development, and the prediction of response to treatment. Subsequent validation of the clinical importance of such candidate genes or proteins requires large-scale analysis of human tissues. To date, this analysis constitutes an important bottleneck in the process of discovery because tissue analysis by the conventional slide-by-slide strategy is slow and expensive. To overcome these limitations, tissue microarray (TMA) technology has been developed. TMA allows for the simultaneous analysis of up to 1,000 tissue samples in a single experiment, using all types of in-situ analyses including immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and RNA in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH). TMA technology has the potential to greatly facilitate the translation of basic research into clinical practice. Potential applications include the establishment of associations between molecular changes and clinical endpoints, testing of potential therapeutic targets using tissue samples from specific cancer patients, standardization of molecular detection of targets, and rapid translation of results from cell lines and animal models to human cancer. Because of its beneficial economic aspects and ability to differentiate ethnic differences in tumor biology, TMA applications may become particularly important in developing countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.