Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15306652›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2004

A conserved role but different partners for the transcriptional corepressor CoREST in fly and mammalian nervous system formation.

Julia E Dallman, Janet Allopenna, Andrew Bassett, Andrew Travers, Gail Mandel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CoRest1 regulates neurogenesis in a stage-dependent manner.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia E DallmanHoward Hughes Medical Institute, State University of New York, Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA.
Janet Allopenna
Andrew Bassett
Andrew Travers
Gail Mandel

Funding

REGULATION OF THE SODIUM CHANNEL IN EXCITABLE CELLSR01NS022518 · NINDS · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MANDEL, GAIL · 1985 to 2013
$4.2M
REGULATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVE-SPECIFIC NA CHANNEL, PN1F32NS010700 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI DALLMAN, JULIA EVE · 1998 to 1999
–
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS010700NINDS NIH HHS NS10700NINDS NIH HHS NS22518NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS022518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of conserved proteins that act to establish the neuronal phenotype has relied predominantly on structural homologies of the underlying genes. In the case of the repressor element 1 silencing transcription factor (REST), a central player in blocking the neuronal phenotype in vertebrate non-neural tissue, the invertebrate homolog is absent, raising the possibility that distinct strategies are used to establish the CNS of invertebrates. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen designed specifically to identify functional analogs of REST, we show that Drosophila melanogaster uses a strategy that is functionally similar to, but appears to have evolved independently of, REST. The gene at the center of the strategy in flies encodes the repressor Tramtrack88 (Ttk88), a protein with no discernable homology to REST but that nonetheless is able to interact with the same transcriptional partners. Ttk88 uses the REST corepressor Drosophila CoREST to coordinately regulate a set of genes encoding the same neuronal hallmarks that are regulated by REST in vertebrates. Our findings indicate that repression is an important mechanism for regulating neuronal phenotype across phyla and suggest that co-option of a similar corepressor complex occurred to restrict expression of genes critical for neuronal function to a compartmentalized nervous system.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCell LineCentral Nervous SystemConserved SequenceCo-Repressor ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsHumansLarvaMiceNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsRE1-Silencing Transcription FactorCo-Repressor ProteinsCoREST protein, DrosophilaDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsRCOR1 protein, humanRcor2 protein, mouseRE1-Silencing Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsTranscription Factorsttk protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID15306652
PMCPMC6729183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.