Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15300387›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2005

[Corneal anomalies in murine trisomy 16].

F Tost, J Wolfinger, J Giebel, W Buselmaier

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Underlying Relationship between Keratoconus and Down Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F TostKlinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Greifswald. Tost@uni-greifswald.de
J Wolfinger
J Giebel
W Buselmaier
Universität Greifswald · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde Universitätsklinikum Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of human Down's syndrome is about 1:700. Investigations using animal models are therefore of clinical relevance for understanding its etiopathogenesis. No corneal changes have been reported with transgenic murine trisomy 16.

methodsA total of 20 fetal mice (n=40 eyes) with experimentally induced trisomy 16 were investigated from day 18 of pregnancy in order to determine whether visible developmental disorders of the cornea occur. All specimen were investigated microscopically in serial sections.

resultsIn addition to disturbances in systemic development, the transgenic mouse fetuses showed high rates of malformation of the eyes. Developmental and differentiation disorders of the corneal epithelial cell layers and structural disturbances of the corneal parenchyma were found. Our findings are the first demonstration of developmental disorders of the cornea in mouse fetuses with trisomy 16. These minor anomalies of the cornea could well have resulted in keratoconus if the animals had survived.

conclusionsOur findings in transgenic mouse fetuses with trisomy 16 correspond to the clinical pattern of Down's syndrome in humans. Disturbed development of lids and lenses have a high prevalence, whereas corneal hypoplasia is found less often.

Indexed as

TrisomyAnimalsCataractCorneaCorneal StromaDisease Models, AnimalDown SyndromeEpithelium, CornealFemaleGestational AgeKeratoconusMiceMice, TransgenicPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID15300387
OpenAlexW82718152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.