Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15299137›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2004

Graft transmission of a floral stimulant derived from CONSTANS.

Brian G Ayre, Robert Turgeon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Methods for graftingPlant methods · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. RNA trafficking in parasitic plant systems.Frontiers in plant science · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian G AyreDepartment of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Robert Turgeon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoperiod in plants is perceived by leaves and in many species influences the transition to reproductive growth through long-distance signaling. CONSTANS (CO) is implicated as a mediator between photoperiod perception and the transition to flowering in Arabidopsis. To test the role of CO in long-distance signaling, CO was expressed from a promoter specific to the companion cells of the smallest veins of mature leaves. This expression in tissues at the inception of the phloem translocation stream was sufficient to accelerate flowering at the apical meristem under noninductive (short-day) conditions. Grafts that conjoined the vegetative stems of plants with different flower-timing phenotypes demonstrated that minor-vein expression of CO is able to substitute for photoperiod in generating a mobile flowering signal. Our results suggest that a CO-derived signal(s), or possibly CO itself, fits the definition of the hypothetical flowering stimulant, florigen.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBase SequenceDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersFlowersGenes, ReporterGlucuronidaseMolecular Sequence DataPlant LeavesPlants, Genetically ModifiedPlant StemsRecombinant ProteinsRNA, PlantSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsArabidopsis ProteinsCONSTANS protein, ArabidopsisDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersGlucuronidaseRecombinant ProteinsRNA, PlantTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15299137
PMCPMC520796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.