Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15298888›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2004

A model of the closed form of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor m2 channel pore.

Sanguk Kim, Aaron K Chamberlain, James U Bowie

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structural answers and persistent questions about how nicotinic receptors work.Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library · 2008
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A gating mechanism proposed from a simulation of a human alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanguk KimDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry and UCLA-Department of Energy Center for Genomics and Proteomics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Aaron K Chamberlain
James U Bowie
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Membrane Protein StabilityR01GM063919 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BOWIE, JAMES U · 2001 to 2021
$5.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is a neurotransmitter-gated ion channel in the postsynaptic membrane. It is composed of five homologous subunits, each of which contributes one transmembrane helix--the M2 helix--to create the channel pore. The M2 helix from the delta subunit is capable of forming a channel by itself. Although a model of the receptor was recently proposed based on a low-resolution, cryo-electron microscopy density map, we found that the model does not explain much of the other available experimental data. Here we propose a new model of the M2 channel derived solely from helix packing and symmetry constraints. This model agrees well with experimental results from solid-state NMR, chemical reactivity, and mutagenesis experiments. The model depicts the channel pore, the channel gate, and the residues responsible for cation specificity.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingMembrane FluidityModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularCell MembraneComputer SimulationIon ChannelsPorosityProtein ConformationProtein Structure, SecondaryReceptors, NicotinicStructure-Activity RelationshipIon ChannelsReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID15298888
PMCPMC1304489
OpenAlexW1965397264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.