Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15297502›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Use of fatty acid RPMI 1640 media for testing susceptibilities of eight Malassezia species to the new triazole posaconazole and to six established antifungal agents by a modified NCCLS M27-A2 microdilution method and Etest.

Aristea Velegraki, Evangelos C Alexopoulos, Stavroula Kritikou, George Gaitanis

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In Vitro Assessment of Azole and Amphotericin B Susceptibilities ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Successful Treatment ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  9. In Vitro Azole and Amphotericin B Susceptibilities ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Susceptibilities ofHeliyon · 2020
    Article
  11. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  12. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aristea VelegrakiMycology Reference Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Medical School, University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75-77, Goudi, Athens 115 27, Greece. aveleg@med.uoa.gr
Evangelos C Alexopoulos
Stavroula Kritikou
George Gaitanis
Hellenic Center for Disease Control & Prevention · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel formulation of RPMI 1640 medium for susceptibility testing of Malassezia yeasts by broth microdilution (BMD) and Etest is proposed. A modification of the NCCLS M27-A2 BMD method was used to test 53 isolates of Malassezia furfur (12 isolates), M. sympodialis (8 isolates), M. slooffiae (4 isolates), M. globosa (22 isolates), M. obtusa (2 isolates), M. restricta (2 isolates), M. pachydermatis (1 isolates), and M. dermatis (2 isolates) against amphotericin B, ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, terbinafine, and posaconazole by BMD and Etest. RPMI and antibiotic medium 3 (AM3) were supplemented with glucose, bile salts, a mixture of fatty acids, and n-octadecanoate fatty acids and Tween 20. M. furfur ATCC 14521 and M. globosa ATCC 96807 were used as quality control strains. Depending on the species, MICs were read after 48 or 72 h of incubation at 32 degrees C. Low azole and terbinafine MICs were recorded for all Malassezia species, whereas amphotericin B displayed higher MICs (>/=16 microg/ml) against M. furfur, M. restricta, M. globosa, and M. slooffiae strains, which were AM3 confirmed. Agreement of the two methods was 84 to 97%, and intraclass correlation coefficients were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Because of higher amphotericin B MICs provided by Etest for strains also displaying high BMD MICs (>/=1 microg/ml), agreement was poorer. The proposed media are used for the first time and can support optimum growth of eight Malassezia species for recording concordant BMD and Etest MICs.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCulture MediaFatty AcidsHumansMalasseziaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycosesTriazolesAntifungal AgentsCulture MediaFatty AcidsposaconazoleTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID15297502
PMCPMC497592
OpenAlexW2144595552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.