Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15297493›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Capillary electrophoretic restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns for the Mycobacterial hsp65 gene.

Hsin-Tsung Ho, Po-Ling Chang, Chia-Chien Hung, Huan-Tsung Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hsin-Tsung HoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Mackay Medicine, Nursing and Management College, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. drho@ms2.mmh.org.tw
Po-Ling Chang
Chia-Chien Hung
Huan-Tsung Chang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis is a nonprobe method for the rapid identification of Mycobacterium species. We demonstrate the separation of DNA or restriction fragments digested from the mycobacterial gene encoding the 65-kDa heat shock protein (hsp65) by capillary electrophoresis (CE). By using a pair of unlabeled primers, Tb11 and Tb12, and only one restriction enzyme, HaeIII, we investigated a total of 52 reference and clinical strains encompassing 12 Mycobacterium species. The electrophoretic separation of high-resolution CE required <20 min and was capable of identifying fragments as small as 12 bp. A good agreement of measurement was observed between the sizes of restriction fragments resolved by CE, and the real sizes were deduced from the sequence analysis. Distinct differentiations were also well demonstrated between some species and subspecies by an extra HaeIII digestion site. With the advantage of the complete RFLP pattern available from CE, it appears to be more convenient to use an electropherogram rather than performing the cumbersome slab gel electrophoresis plus diagnostic algorithm to identify Mycobacterium species. Beyond the agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, high-resolution CE provides an alternative for rapid identification of Mycobacterium species that is feasible for automation and routine use without the need for costly probes.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceChaperonin 60ChaperoninsDNA PrimersElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansMycobacteriumBacterial ProteinsChaperonin 60ChaperoninsDNA Primersheat-shock protein 65, Mycobacterium

Identifiers

PMID15297493
PMCPMC497582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.