Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15296557›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2004

Lung cancer patients' perceptions of access to financial benefits: a qualitative study.

Alison Chapple, Sue Ziebland, Ann McPherson, Nick Summerton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Equitable inclusion of patients with cancer on the palliative care register: a systematic review in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Identifying a cut-off score for the COST measure to indicate high financial toxicity and low quality of life among cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Non-visible disease, the hidden disruptive experiences of chronic illness in adversity.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017
    Article
  14. Acknowledging stigma: Its presence in patient care and medical education.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017
    Article
  15. Counting the cost of cancer: out-of-pocket payments made by colorectal cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. How much does it cost to care for survivors of colorectal cancer? Caregiver's time, travel and out-of-pocket costs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alison ChappleDepartment of Primary Health Care,University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Headington OX3 7LF. alison.chapple@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Sue Ziebland
Ann McPherson
Nick Summerton
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinancial worries may add to the stress experienced by patients and their families, but they are often not discussed with health professionals. People with lung cancer usually have to give up work, and many are terminally ill.

aimTo explore the financial concerns, perceptions and experiences of claiming benefits of people with lung cancer. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study using narrative interviews.

settingUnited Kingdom.

methodInterviews with a maximum variation sample of 45 people with lung cancer, recruited through general practitioners, consultants, nurses and support groups.

resultsSome people did not know that they could claim financial benefits, others found claim forms complicated, or were unaware that they had no legal right for important allowances to be backdated. Some people had to 'struggle' to obtain much needed benefits to which they were entitled. Patients below retirement age said that they would prefer to be working, and many were shocked by how hard it was to obtain the information needed to make claims. There was some evidence that even those who are seriously ill, and life-time tax payers, feel stigma in claiming financial help. Nurses, doctors and other patients sometimes offered valuable guidance, but many patients did not receive timely advice. The special social security rules (and DS1500 report form), which might have allowed them to claim benefits more rapidly than usual and at a higher rate, were not always understood.

conclusionMany reasons were found as to why people with lung cancer have difficulty getting the benefits that they are entitled to. Hospital and primary care staff who handle the issue sensitively and help set claims in motion provide a valuable service that should be replicated throughout the National Health Service.

Indexed as

Social SecurityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchStress, PsychologicalUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID15296557
PMCPMC1324838
OpenAlexW2111437292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.