Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15294773›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2004

Ecology and transmission of Listeria monocytogenes infecting ruminants and in the farm environment.

K K Nightingale, Y H Schukken, C R Nightingale, E D Fortes, A J Ho, Z Her, Y T Grohn, P L McDonough, M Wiedmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Occurrence ofVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Review
  9. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Detection and Molecular Characterization ofVeterinary medicine international · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

K K NightingaleDepartment of Food Science, 412 Stocking Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Y H Schukken
C R Nightingale
E D Fortes
A J Ho
Z Her
Y T Grohn
P L McDonough
M Wiedmann

Funding

L. MONOCYTOGENES CLONAL GROUPS: ECOLOGY AND TRANSMISSIONR01GM063259 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI WIEDMANN, MARTIN · 2001 to 2004
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063259NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM63259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A case-control study involving 24 case farms with at least one recent case of listeriosis and 28 matched control farms with no listeriosis cases was conducted to probe the transmission and ecology of Listeria monocytogenes on farms. A total of 528 fecal, 516 feed, and 1,012 environmental soil and water samples were cultured for L. monocytogenes. While the overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes in cattle case farms (24.4%) was similar to that in control farms (20.2%), small-ruminant (goat and sheep) farms showed a significantly (P < 0.0001) higher prevalence in case farms (32.9%) than in control farms (5.9%). EcoRI ribotyping of clinical (n = 17) and farm (n = 414) isolates differentiated 51 ribotypes. L. monocytogenes ribotypes isolated from clinical cases and fecal samples were more frequent in environmental than in feed samples, indicating that infected animals may contribute to L. monocytogenes dispersal into the farm environment. Ribotype DUP-1038B was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with fecal samples compared with farm environment and animal feedstuff samples. Ribotype DUP-1045A was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with soil compared to feces and with control farms compared to case farms. Our data indicate that (i) the epidemiology and transmission of L. monocytogenes differ between small-ruminant and cattle farms; (ii) cattle contribute to amplification and dispersal of L. monocytogenes into the farm environment, (iii) the bovine farm ecosystem maintains a high prevalence of L. monocytogenes, including subtypes linked to human listeriosis cases and outbreaks, and (iv) L. monocytogenes subtypes may differ in their abilities to infect animals and to survive in farm environments.

Indexed as

AgricultureAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesEcosystemGoat DiseasesGoatsListeria monocytogenesListeriosisPrevalenceRuminantsSheepSheep DiseasesSoil MicrobiologyWater Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID15294773
PMCPMC492327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.