Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15293806›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2004

The scarless heart and the MRL mouse.

Ellen Heber-Katz, John Leferovich, Khamilia Bedelbaeva, Dmitri Gourevitch, Lise Clark

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin pathway promotes regenerative repair of cutaneous and cartilage injury.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. From Immunity and Vaccines to Mammalian Regeneration.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Regeneration of articular cartilage in healer and non-healer mice.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2014
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen Heber-KatzThe Wistar Institute, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. heberkatz@wistar.upenn.edu
John Leferovich
Khamilia Bedelbaeva
Dmitri Gourevitch
Lise Clark
The Wistar Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to regenerate tissues and limbs in its most robust form is seen in many non-mammalian species. The serendipitous discovery that the MRL mouse has a profound capacity for regeneration in some ways rivalling the classic newt and axolotl species raises the possibility that humans, too, may have an innate regenerative ability. The adult MRL mouse regrows cartilage, skin, hair follicles and myocardium with near perfect fidelity and without scarring. This is seen in the ability to close through-and-through ear holes, which are generally used for lifelong identification of mice, and the anatomic and functional recovery of myocardium after a severe cryo-injury. We present histological, biochemical and genetic data indicating that the enhanced breakdown of scar-like tissue may be an underlying factor in the MRL regenerative response. Studies as to the source of the cells in the regenerating MRL tissue are discussed. Such studies appear to support multiple mechanisms for cell replacement.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationMyocardiumAnimalsCentral Nervous SystemCicatrixCrosses, GeneticMiceMice, Inbred MRL lprQuantitative Trait LociRegenerationWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID15293806
PMCPMC1693365
OpenAlexW2084699825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.