ReviewCurrent oncology reports2004
Novel approaches to immunotherapy for B-cell malignancies.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cellular therapies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2011Review
- Cellular therapies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Current opinion in molecular therapeutics · 2009Review
- Novel approaches to the immunotherapy of B-cell malignancies: An update.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Immunotherapy for cancer refers to a wide array of novel therapeutic interventions that harness the immune system to target and eradicate malignant cells in the host. Advances in the understanding of how tumor cells evade host immune detection, coupled with improved gene transduction technologies, have enabled investigators to propose and test novel immune-based therapies for B-cell malignancies. As a result, more immunogenic vaccination strategies, able to elicit immune responses to otherwise poorly immunogenic tumor antigens, are being tested in early clinical trials. Furthermore, with the development of efficient T-cell transduction methodologies, investigators are able to generate autologous antitumor T-cell responses through the introduction of chimeric antigen receptors able to target tumor antigens. However, whether the promising preclinical and phase I clinical data presented here will ultimately translate into improved survival of patients with B-cell malignancies remains largely unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.