ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2004
Ethics review procedures for research in developing countries: a basic presumption of guilt.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulatory approval of clinical trials: is it time to reinvent the wheel?BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Development and Implementation of Culturally Tailored Offline Mobile Health Surveys.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2016Article
- Fostering IRB collaboration for review of international research.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2014Review
- Research ethics in The Union: an 8-year review of the Ethics Advisory Group.Public health action · 2013Article
- Why ethics is indispensable for good-quality operational research.Public health action · 2012Article
- Research ethics review in humanitarian contexts: the experience of the independent ethics review board of Médecins Sans Frontières.PLoS medicine · 2009Article
- Consenting of the vulnerable: the informed consent procedure in advanced cancer patients in Mexico.BMC medical ethics · 2006Article
- Bench-to-bedside review: human subjects research--are more standards needed?Critical care (London, England) · 2006Review
- Review of multinational human subjects research: experience from the PHFI-Emory Center of Excellence partnership.Indian journal of medical ethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.