ArticleDrugs & aging2004
Assessing the health and economic impact of galantamine treatment in patients with Alzheimer's disease in the health care systems of different countries.
Article in Drugs & aging, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid health technology assessment of galantamine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: A review.Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.PharmacoEconomics · 2013Pooled it
- Health state values for use in the economic evaluation of treatments for Alzheimer's disease.Drugs & aging · 2012Pooled it
- Modelling disease progression in Alzheimer's disease: a review of modelling methods used for cost-effectiveness analysis.PharmacoEconomics · 2007Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of memantine for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease in the Netherlands.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2011Article
- Galantamine-ER for the treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease.Clinical interventions in aging · 2010Review
- NICE cost-effectiveness appraisal of cholinesterase inhibitors: was the right question posed? Were the best tools used?PharmacoEconomics · 2007Review
- Is long-term treatment of Alzheimer's disease with cholinesterase inhibitor therapy justified?Drugs & aging · 2007Review
- Memantine: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease.PharmacoEconomics · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCholinesterase inhibitors have been shown to improve cognitive function and improve or maintain global function.
objectiveTo estimate the long-term economic impact of treating patients with Alzheimer's disease with galantamine in seven healthcare systems: Australia, Canada, Finland, New Zealand, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK.
methodsThe time until patients require full-time care (FTC), defined as the consistent requirement for a significant amount of care giving and supervision each day, and the associated costs were evaluated using the 'Assessment of Health Economics in Alzheimer's Disease (AHEAD)' model. Efficacy data were obtained from three clinical trials comparing galantamine with placebo and local cost and resource use data were determined for each country. Forecast costs reported in Euros (2001 value), were made for up to 10 years in each healthcare system. All costs were determined from a perspective somewhat broader than that of a comprehensive payer, including social services. Both benefits and costs were discounted at 3%.
resultsGalantamine (16 mg/day) is predicted to delay the need for FTC by 6.8%, thus the cumulative cost of care over 10 years is expected to be reduced, and this offsets much or all of the cost of galantamine. Approximately five patients need to be treated to avoid 1 year of FTC. In each healthcare system, FTC was estimated to account for 61-92% of the cost. Savings were estimated for most of the countries. For those countries with an expected expense, there were reasonable costs per FTC month avoided (euro553, discounted) and costs per quality-adjusted life year gained (euro25,000).
conclusionIn addition to the clinical benefits associated with galantamine treatment, the savings predicted from delaying FTC may offset the treatment costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.