Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15284444›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2004

Tubular precipitation and redox gradients on a bubbling template.

David A Stone, Raymond E Goldstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. On the differing growth mechanisms of black-smoker and Lost City-type hydrothermal vents.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Article
  5. Precipitation and Crystallization Kinetics in Silica Gardens.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The inevitable journey to being.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Extreme accumulation of nucleotides in simulated hydrothermal pore systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David A StoneDepartment of Soil, Water, and Environmental Science, Program in Applied Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Raymond E Goldstein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tubular structures created by precipitation abound in nature, from chimneys at hydrothermal vents to soda straws in caves. Their formation is controlled by chemical gradients within which precipitation occurs, defining a surface that templates the growing structure. We report a self-organized periodic templating mechanism producing tubular structures electrochemically in iron-ammonium-sulfate solutions; iron oxides precipitate on the surface of bubbles that linger at the tube rim and then detach, leaving behind a ring of material. The acid-base and redox gradients spontaneously generated by diffusion of ammonia from the bubble into solution organize radial compositional layering within the tube wall, a mechanism studied on a larger scale by complex Liesegang patterns of iron oxides formed as ammonia diffuses through a gel containing FeSO(4). When magnetite forms within the wall, a tube may grow curved in an external magnetic field. Connections with free-boundary problems in speleothem formation are emphasized.

Identifiers

PMID15284444
PMCPMC511016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.