ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004
Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost?
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Constraints and Enablers of Turnaround Time for Ethics Review: The Case of Institutional Review Boards in Tanzania.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2021Article
- Research under the GDPR - a level playing field for public and private sector research?Life sciences, society and policy · 2021Article
- Insights into the perception that research ethics committees are a barrier to research with seriously ill children: A study of committee minutes and correspondence with researchers studying seriously ill children.Palliative medicine · 2020Article
- Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
- The high costs of getting ethical and site-specific approvals for multi-centre research.Research integrity and peer review · 2016Article
- A Scoping Review of Empirical Research Relating to Quality and Effectiveness of Research Ethics Review.PloS one · 2015Article
- Undergraduate research involving human subjects should not be granted ethical approval unless it is likely to be of publishable quality.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2014Article
- Challenges in quantifying the patient-reported burden of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia in the UK: learnings from the Zoster Quality of Life (ZQOL) study.BMC research notes · 2013Article
- Bureaucracy stifles medical research in Britain: a tale of three trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2012Article
- Data sharing in the post-genomic world: the experience of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) Data Access Compliance Office (DACO).PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Reflections on running training workshops for research ethics committee members in Spain between 2001 and 2008.Croatian medical journal · 2010Article
- Clinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research?BMC public health · 2008Article
- Setting up non-commercial clinical trials takes too long in the UK: findings from a prospective study.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2008Article
- NHS research ethics committees.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Article
- Ethics of collecting and using healthcare data.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Article
- Innovations in the Ethical Review of Health-Related Quality Improvement and Research: The Alberta Research Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI).Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2007Article
- Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK?Journal of medical ethics · 2006Review
- Research ethics committees in the UK--the pressure is now on research and development departments.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2005Review
- Ethics and research governance in a multicentre study: add 150 days to your study protocol.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Article
- Ethics, audit, and research: all shades of grey.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.