ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004
Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Eligibility criteria in knee osteoarthritis clinical trials: systematic review.Clinical rheumatology · 2013Pooled it
- "Let's get the best quality research we can": public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study.BMC medical research methodology · 2013Pooled it
- Trial
- Impact of privacy legislation on the number and characteristics of people who are recruited for research: a randomised controlled trial.Journal of medical ethics · 2006Trial
- Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of "opt-in" versus "opt-out" strategies.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Trial
- Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
- The value of pragmatic and observational studies in health care and public health.Pragmatic and observational research · 2017Review
- The risk of re-identification versus the need to identify individuals in rare disease research.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Article
- Diverging prevalences and different risk factors for childhood asthma and eczema: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2015Article
- Challenges in quantifying the patient-reported burden of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia in the UK: learnings from the Zoster Quality of Life (ZQOL) study.BMC research notes · 2013Article
- Heightened attention to medical privacy: challenges for unbiased sample recruitment and a possible solution.American journal of epidemiology · 2010Article
- Challenges in evaluating Welfare to Work policy interventions: would an RCT design have been the answer to all our problems?BMC public health · 2010Article
- Recruiting older people to a randomised controlled dietary intervention trial--how hard can it be?BMC medical research methodology · 2010Article
- Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent.Implementation science : IS · 2008Article
- Clinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research?BMC public health · 2008Article
- Assessing the impact of the requirement for explicit consent in a hospital-based stroke study.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2008Article
- Evaluating common de-identification heuristics for personal health information.Journal of medical Internet research · 2006Article
- Overcoming barriers to recruitment in health research.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Review
- Using personal health information in medical research.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: seeking a balance: response from the Department of Health and COREC.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.