ArticleMycopathologia1992
Diagnosis of disseminated candidiasis in hospitalized patients using the Cand-Tec latex agglutination assay.
Article in Mycopathologia, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis of invasive mycoses in severely immunosuppressed patients.Annals of hematology · 1993Review
- Laboratory aids in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis.Mycopathologia · 1992Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A total of 1,303 sera from 202 patients at risk for disseminated candidiasis were analyzed for the presence of Candida antigen using a commercially available latex agglutination test (Cand-Tec). Twenty-three patients had disseminated candidiasis documented by positive blood cultures, deep biopsy culture and histopathology or autopsy. Six patients had transient candidemia, 15 patients had candiduria, 62 patients were not colonized yet treated empirically with amphotericin B, and 46 patients were not colonized and not treated with amphotericin B. The sensitivity and specificity of the Candida antigen test for the diagnosis of disseminated candidiasis was 87% and 36% (threshold titer of greater than or equal to 1:2), 70% and 60% (greater than or equal to 1:4), and 30% and 85% (greater than or equal to 1:8), respectively. In contrast to previous studies we were unable to demonstrate a prognostic role for the Candida antigen test in patients with documented disseminated candidiasis. The lack of sensitivity and specificity of the Cand-Tec Candida antigen test precludes its use in the diagnosis of disseminated candidiasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.