Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15280917›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2004

Incidence of childhood leukaemia in the vicinity of nuclear sites in France, 1990-1998.

M L White-Koning, D Hémon, D Laurier, M Tirmarche, E Jougla, A Goubin, J Clavel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. French nuclear power plants and childhood leukemia.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2014
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Commentary: childhood cancer near nuclear power stations.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2009
    Article
  6. Childhood leukaemia incidence below the age of 5 years near French nuclear power plants.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2008
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M L White-KoningInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM - U170-IFR69, 16 avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94807 Villejuif Cedex, France.
D Hémon
D Laurier
M Tirmarche
E Jougla
A Goubin
J Clavel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overall, 670 cases (O) of childhood leukaemia were diagnosed within 20 km of the 29 French nuclear installations between 1990 and 1998 compared to an expected number (E) of 729.09 cases (O/E=0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI)=[0.85-0.99]). Each of the four areas defined around the sites showed non significant deficits of cases (0-5 km: O=65, O/E=0.87, CI=[0.67-1.10]; 5-10 km: O=165, O/E=0.95, CI=[0.81-1.10]; 10-15 km: O=220, O/E=0.88, CI=[0.77-1.00]; 15-20 km: O=220, O/E=0.96, CI=[0.84-1.10]). There was no evidence of a trend in standardised incidence ratio with distance from the sites for all children or for any of the three age groups studied. Similar results were obtained when the start-up year of the electricity-generating nuclear sites and their electric nuclear power were taken into account. No evidence was found of a generally increased risk of childhood leukaemia around the 29 French nuclear sites under study during 1990-1998.

Indexed as

Nuclear ReactorsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFranceHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornLeukemia, Radiation-Induced

Identifiers

PMID15280917
PMCPMC2409865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.