ArticleJournal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology2004
Combined exposure to carbon disulfide and sulfuric acid simultaneously increases the risk of hand dermatitis in rayon industry.
Article in Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the association between hand dermatitis (HD) and occupational exposure to CS(2) and to determine whether combined exposure to CS(2) and H(2)SO(4) exhibits a higher risk of HD.
methodsIn all, 110 subjects from a rayon factory were recruited and their exposure was classified into CS(2) exclusively, H(2)SO(4) exclusively, combined exposure, and nonexposure control based on workers' job characteristics. A dermatologist was designated in the diagnosis of HD on palm and dorsal sites for each subject. Other confounding factors including detergent, glove wearing, and participation in wet work were determined using a person-to-person questionnaire interview from 37 randomly selected subjects.
resultsSignificant elevated odds ratios (ORs) for HD were found in CS(2) exclusively (44.8, P < 0.01) and combined exposure (49.0, P < 0.001) compared with control. Dose-response trends of ORs for HD were found across control, single exposure, and combined exposure for both CS(2) and H(2)SO(4).
conclusionsHD could occur resulting from occupational exposure to CS(2) alone. This study was unable to affirm that the exposure to H(2)SO(4) alone is associated with HD due to limited H(2)SO(4) exposure subjects. The combined exposure to both CS(2) and H(2)SO(4) simultaneously could increase the risk of HD. The control remedy in preventing dermal contact with either CS(2) or H(2)SO(4) among the rayon workers should be performed immediately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.