Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15280404›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2004

Intraepithelial lymphocytes in the villous tip: do they indicate potential coeliac disease?

F Biagi, O Luinetti, J Campanella, C Klersy, C Zambelli, V Villanacci, A Lanzini, G R Corazza

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Immunohistochemical analysis of intestinal biopsies in individuals with celiac disease.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

F BiagiGastroenterology Unit, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy. f.biagi@smatteo.pv.it
O Luinetti
J Campanella
C Klersy
C Zambelli
V Villanacci
A Lanzini
G R Corazza
Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITBrescia University · USIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe counting of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) in the villous tips of architecturally normal small bowel biopsy specimens was proposed as a method to measure mucosal infiltration in gluten sensitive patients.

aimsTo apply this straightforward method in duodenal biopsy specimens from patients affected by potential coeliac disease (PCD) to verify whether it can discriminate these patients from controls.

methodsParaffin wax embedded duodenal sections from 11 patients affected by PCD were stained with an antihuman CD3 antibody. Sections from 19 patients affected by treated coeliac disease (TCD) and 17 patients in whom coeliac disease was excluded were stained with the same antibody to serve as controls. The slides were examined blindly. IELs/20 enterocytes in five randomly chosen villous tips were counted. Patients affected by PCD were all on a gluten containing diet. They had an architecturally normal duodenal mucosa and were positive for endomysial antibody. Both TCD and non-coeliac controls were negative for endomysial antibody.

resultsThe mean villous tip IEL scores were 4.6 (SD, 1.5; range, 1.4-7.8) in non-coeliac controls, 7.9 (SD, 4.0; range, 2.0-18.6) in TCD, and 9.2 (SD, 4.7; range, 5.8-21.8) in patients with PCD. The difference between PCD and non-coeliac controls was significant.

conclusionsThis is a very simple and sufficiently reliable method to count IELs. In patients with an architecturally normal duodenal mucosa, the IEL count in villous tips helps to distinguish between patients with PCD and non-coeliac controls.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalCase-Control StudiesCD3 ComplexCeliac DiseaseDuodenumFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIntestinal MucosaLymphocyte CountLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsAntibodies, MonoclonalCD3 Complex

Identifiers

PMID15280404
PMCPMC1770380
OpenAlexW2088154498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.