Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15279727›Full record

ArticleJournal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics2004

Preventive versus treatment effect of AG3340, a potent matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor in a rat model of choroidal neovascularization.

Mohammed El Bradey, Lingyun Cheng, Dirk-Uwe Bartsch, Krzystof Appelt, Nuttawut Rodanant, Germaine Bergeron-Lynn, William R Freeman

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Matrix Metalloproteinases in Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD).International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  2. Matrix Metalloproteinases and Glaucoma Treatment.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases in the subretinal fluid correlates with the extent of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2007
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed El BradeyUniversity of California, San Diego, Jacobs Retina Center, and Shiley Eye Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Lingyun Cheng
Dirk-Uwe Bartsch
Krzystof Appelt
Nuttawut Rodanant
Germaine Bergeron-Lynn
William R Freeman
The Retina Center · USAgouron Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

TREATMENT OF RETINOPATHY ASSOCIATED WITH AIDSR01EY007366 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FREEMAN, WILLIAM R. · 1988 to 2013
$7.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAG3340 (prinomastat) is a nonpeptidic, small-molecular-weight, synthetic matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (MMPI) with selective inhibitory action of MMP-2, MMP-9, MMP-3, and MT-MMP1. We evaluated AG3340 injected intravitreally to treat choroidal neovascularization in a laser induced rat CNV model.

methodsIn the pretreatment group, the drug was injected the same day after induction of choroidal neovascularization by diode laser. In the treatment group, the drug was injected 2 weeks after induction of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography were performed to evaluate CNV. ERG recordings and histology were performed to assess toxicity and the CNV lesions.

resultsWhen used at the time of CNV induction, 62.8% of lesions in control versus 22.8% of the laser lesions in treated eyes developed CNV (p < 0.0001). The invading fibrovascular complex was thicker in the control eyes than that in the treated eyes. No signs of toxicity were detected. When used to treat established CNV, the percentage of leakage in treated and control eyes were 54.1% and 58.9% respectively (p > 0.05). Prinomastat was effective when given at the time of induction of CNV in the rat model. Administration of prinomastat 2 weeks after laser induction did not show efficacy.

conclusionPrinomastat was active in the earliest stages of experimental CNV. It might be best used in combination with photodynamic therapy to inhibit recurrence of CNV from temporarily closed new vessels.

Indexed as

Matrix Metalloproteinase InhibitorsAnimalsChoroidal NeovascularizationDisease Models, AnimalElectroretinographyEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleFluorescein AngiographyInjectionsLaser CoagulationOrganic ChemicalsRatsRats, Inbred BNRetinal HemorrhageTime FactorsVitreous BodyEnzyme InhibitorsMatrix Metalloproteinase InhibitorsOrganic Chemicalsprinomastat

Identifiers

PMID15279727
PMCPMC1360230
OpenAlexW2075044031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.