Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15278690›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2004

Treatment strategies in patients with chronic renal disease: ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor antagonists, or both?

Karl F Hilgers, Jörg Dötsch, Wolfgang Rascher, Johannes F E Mann

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Microalbuminuria and early renal response to lethal dose Shiga toxin type 2 in rats.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2012
    Article
  7. Chronic kidney disease: highlights for the general pediatrician.International journal of pediatrics · 2012
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Nephrotoxicity as a cause of acute kidney injury in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2008
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karl F HilgersDepartment of Medicine IV, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany, karl.hilgers@rzmail.uni-erlangen.de
Jörg Dötsch
Wolfgang Rascher
Johannes F E Mann
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We discuss the evidence supporting the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB), or the combination of both in children with chronic renal disease. Several large-scale, prospective, randomized studies with clinical end points have been performed in adult patients, but studies in children are relatively scarce. In adult patients with chronic renal diseases, ACEI clearly delay the progression of chronic non-diabetic renal diseases, and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes. The benefits of ACEI are most apparent in glomerular diseases with marked proteinuria but extend also to kidney diseases with lower proteinuria. This notion is also supported by several smaller or retrospective trials in children. Therefore, ACEI should be given to children with chronic renal diseases, particularly if high blood pressure and/or proteinuria are present. In adults, large-scale trials have documented that ARB exert similar effects as ACEI but tend to exert fewer undesired side effects. Data on ARB in children with chronic renal disease are still very scarce, but these substances offer an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate ACEI due to unwarranted side effects. Combination therapy with ARB plus ACEI may be more effective than either drug class alone. However, we will need the results of further long-term prospective clinical studies, as well as a better understanding of the role of the AT(2) receptor, before combination therapy can be widely recommended. A trial of ARB plus ACEI is justified in selected patients if blood pressure and/or proteinuria cannot adequately be lowered by ACEI or ARB alone.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAnimalsChildChronic DiseaseClinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansKidney DiseasesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers

Identifiers

PMID15278690
OpenAlexW2050641258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.