ArticleOncogene2004
Direct FGF receptor 1 activation through an anti-idiotypic strategy mimicks the biological activity of FGF-2 and inhibits the progression of the bladder carcinoma derived from NBT-II cells.
Article in Oncogene, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hypothesis that tumor growth is angiogenesis-dependent has been documented by a considerable body of direct and indirect experimental data. Since the discovery of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), most attention has been focused on the VEGF system. Although fibroblast growth factors 1 and 2 (FGF-1 and FGF-2) can exert a strong angiogenic activity when they are supplied as a single pharmacological agent, their role in pathological angiogenesis in preclinical models remains controversial. To decipher the contribution of FGF receptors in various models of angiogenesis, we took advantage of the anti-idiotypic strategy to obtain circulating agonists specific for FGFR-1 and FGFR-2 (AIdF-1 and AIdF-2). They mimicked FGF-1 and FGF-2 for receptor binding, signal transduction, proliferation of endothelial cells and differentiation of the bladder carcinoma cell NBT-II which expresses FGFR-2b but not FGFR-1. The constitutive expression of FGFR-1 allowed binding of FGF-2 and AIdF-2 and inhibition of the proliferation of NBT-II cells. AIdF-1 and AIdF-2 induced angiogenesis in the corneal pocket assay. Although FGFR-1 dimerization achieved by AIdF-2 injection led to highly differentiated and smaller NBT-II tumors, no sign of reduction of tumor angiogenesis was observed, thus suggesting that endothelial cells are resistant to FGF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.