Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15273544›Full record

ReviewAnnals of surgery2004

Clinical application of bioartificial liver support systems.

Maarten Paul van de Kerkhove, Ruurdtje Hoekstra, Robert A F M Chamuleau, Thomas M van Gulik

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of surgery, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Liver support systems for adults with acute liver failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Posthepatectomy liver failureTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bioengineered Liver Models for Drug Testing and Cell Differentiation Studies.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cell and tissue engineering for liver disease.Science translational medicine · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maarten Paul van de KerkhoveDepartment of Surgery (Surgical Laboratory), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruurdtje Hoekstra
Robert A F M Chamuleau
Thomas M van Gulik
University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the present status of bioartificial liver (BAL) devices and their obtained clinical results.

backgroundAcute liver failure (ALF) is a disease with a high mortality. Standard therapy at present is liver transplantation. Liver transplantation is hampered by the increasing shortage of organ donors, resulting in high incidence of patients with ALF dying on the transplantation waiting list. Among a variety of liver assist therapies, BAL therapy is marked as the most promising solution to bridge ALF patients to liver transplantation or to liver regeneration, because several BAL systems showed significant survival improvement in animal ALF studies. Until today, clinical application of 11 different BAL systems has been reported.

methodsA literature review was performed using MEDLINE and additional library searches. Only BAL systems that have been used in a clinical trial were included in this review.

resultsEleven BAL systems found clinical application. Three systems were studied in a controlled trial, showing no significant survival benefits, in part due to the insufficient number of patients included. The other systems were studied in a phase I trial or during treatment of a single patient and all showed to be safe. Most BAL therapies resulted in improvement of clinical and biochemical parameters.

conclusionsBioartificial liver therapy for bridging patients with ALF to liver transplantation or liver regeneration is promising. Its clinical value awaits further improvement of BAL devices, replacement of hepatocytes of animal origin by human hepatocytes, and assessment in controlled clinical trials.

Indexed as

Liver, ArtificialCritical IllnessExtracorporeal CirculationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver FailureLiver TransplantationMaleRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeWaiting Lists

Identifiers

PMID15273544
PMCPMC1356396
OpenAlexW2156996385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.