Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15273108›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2004

Relationship between triclosan and susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from hands in the community.

Allison E Aiello, Bonnie Marshall, Stuart B Levy, Phyllis Della-Latta, Elaine Larson

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibacterial cleaning products and drug resistance.Emerging infectious diseases · 2005
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Triclosan Tolerance Is Driven by a Conserved Mechanism in DiverseApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Resistance of Bacteria to Biocides.Microbiology spectrum · 2018
    Review
  11. The Florence Statement on Triclosan and Triclocarban.Environmental health perspectives · 2017
    Article
  12. Triclosan: A Widespread Environmental Toxicant with Many Biological Effects.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Allison E AielloCenter for Social Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-2548, USA. aielloa@umich.edu
Bonnie Marshall
Stuart B Levy
Phyllis Della-Latta
Elaine Larson
Tufts University · USColumbia University · USRobert Wood Johnson Foundation · USRoyal College of Physicians · GB

Funding

HOME HYGIENE INTERVENTION (COMPETING SUPPLEMENT)R01NR005251 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LARSON, ELAINE LUCILLE · 2000 to 2002
$799k
NINR NIH HHS 3 R01 NR05251-02S1NINR NIH HHS R01 NR005251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The possible association between triclosan and bacterial susceptibility to antibiotic was examined among staphylococci and several species of gram-negative bacteria (GNB) isolated from the hands of individuals in a community setting. Hand cultures from individuals randomized to using either antibacterial cleaning and hygiene products (including a hand soap containing 0.2% triclosan) or nonantibacterial cleaning and hygiene products for a 1-year period were taken at baseline and at the end of the year. Although there was no statistically significant association between triclosan MICs and susceptibility to antibiotic, there was an increasing trend in the association the odds ratios (ORs) for all species were compared at baseline (OR = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 0.33 to 1.27) versus at the end of the year (OR = 1.08, 95%CI = 0.62 to 1.97) and for GNB alone at baseline(OR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.29 to 1.51) versus the end of year (OR = 2.69, 95%CI = 0.78 to 9.23) regardless of the hand-washing product used. Moreover, triclosan MICs were higher in some of the species compared to earlier reports on household, clinical, and industrial isolates, and some of these isolates had triclosan MICs in the range of concentrations used in consumer products. The absence of a statistically significant association between elevated triclosan MICs and reduced antibiotic susceptibility may indicate that such a correlation does not exist or that it is relatively small among the isolates that were studied. Still, a relationship may emerge after longer-term or higher-dose exposure of bacteria to triclosan in the community setting.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBacteriaColony Count, MicrobialDouble-Blind MethodDrug Resistance, BacterialHandHumansHygieneMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTriclosanAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalTriclosan

Identifiers

PMID15273108
PMCPMC478530
OpenAlexW2119918026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.