Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15272029›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2004

Ca(2+) and K(+) (BK) channels in chick hair cells are clustered and colocalized with apical-basal and tonotopic gradients.

Haresha Samaranayake, James C Saunders, Mark I Greene, Dhasakumar S Navaratnam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BK Channels in the Central Nervous System.International review of neurobiology · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Gene expression gradients along the tonotopic axis of the chicken auditory epithelium.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haresha SamaranayakeDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, 703 LCI Building, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. dhasakumar.navaratnam@yale.edu.
James C Saunders
Mark I Greene
Dhasakumar S Navaratnam

Funding

HAIR CELL PATHOPHYSIOLOGYR01DC000710 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SAUNDERS, JAMES C · 1990 to 2006
$1.9M
Analysis of cSlo interacting proteins in the inner earK08DC005352 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NAVARATNAM, DHASAKUMAR S · 2001 to 2005
$765k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC000710NIDCD NIH HHS K08 DC005352NIDCD NIH HHS K08 DC5352NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical resonance is a mechanism used by birds and many vertebrates to discriminate between frequencies of sound, and occurs when the intrinsic oscillation in the membrane potential of a specific hair cell corresponds to a specific stimulus sound frequency. This intrinsic oscillation results from an interplay between an inward Ca(2+) current and the resultant activation of a hyperpolarizing Ca(2+)-activated K(+) current. These channels are predicted to lie in close proximity owing to the fast oscillation in membrane potential. The interplay of these channels is widespread in the nervous system, where they perform numerous roles including the control of synaptic release, burst frequency and circadian rhythm generation. Here, we used confocal microscopy to show that these two ion channels are clustered and colocalized in the chick hair cell membrane. The majority of Ca(2+) channels were colocalized while the proportion of colocalized BK channels was markedly less. In addition, we report both an apical-basal gradient of these clusters in individual hair cells, as well as a gradient in the number of clusters between hair cells along the tonotopic axis. These results give physical confirmation of previous predictions. Since the proportion of colocalized channels was a constant function of Ca(2+) channels, and not of BK channels, these results suggest that their colocalization is determined by the former. The molecular mechanisms underpinning their clustering and colocalization are likely to be common to other neuronal cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium ChannelsCell PolarityChickensHair Cells, AuditoryLarge-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium ChannelsMicroscopy, ConfocalPotassium Channels, Calcium-ActivatedReceptor AggregationCalcium ChannelsLarge-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium ChannelsPotassium Channels, Calcium-Activated

Identifiers

PMID15272029
PMCPMC1665200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.