Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15271836›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments.

Michael D Rawlins, Anthony J Culyer

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 214 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Identification and Referral to Improve Safety Programme and the Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Guideline
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Psychometric properties comparison between EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in the general Thai population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael D RawlinsWolfson Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle NE2 4HH.
Anthony J Culyer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Decision Making, OrganizationalJudgmentTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalAcademies and InstitutesGovernment AgenciesHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareState MedicineUnited KingdomHealth Care and Public HealthNational Health ServiceNational Institute for Clinical Excellence (Great Britain)

Identifiers

PMID15271836
PMCPMC487742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.