Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15269299›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2004

Increased sensitivity of the Roche COBAS AMPLICOR HCV test, version 2.0, using modified extraction techniques.

Michael Stuart Forman, Alexandra Valsamakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael Stuart FormanDivision of Microbiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Meyer B1-193, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-7093, USA.
Alexandra Valsamakis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processing modifications were made to the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV version 2.0 assay to enhance sensitivity. Two methods of specimen concentration, centrifugation ("ultraspin") and cationic detergent plus silica membrane ("ultracolumn"), were compared to the standard method. The effect of these changes on assay sensitivity and specificity was examined using commercial hepatitis C virus (HCV) preparations. The limits of detection (LOD, defined as detection of HCV RNA in >/= 95% of replicates) of genotype 1a were 50, 12, and 6 by standard method, ultraspin and ultracolumn, respectively. For genotype 1b, the LOD was 25 IU/ml, 12 IU/ml, and 3 IU/ml; for 2b, it was 50, 12, and 3; for 3a, it was 25, 12, and 1.5; for 4 it was 18, 4, and 2; for 5a, it was 38, 9, and 2; and for 6a it was 47, 6, and 3. No false positives were detected after ultraspin when controls containing high or low HCV concentrations were alternated with normal human plasma. Plasmas in which HCV RNA was not detected by the standard assay were re-tested with modified methods to assess the effect of altered processing in clinical specimens. Three of 152 specimens with no detectable HCV RNA by the standard method were positive by ultraspin and 2 of 109 were positive by ultracolumn, suggesting that these methods may increase assay sensitivity in clinical specimens.

Indexed as

HepacivirusHepatitis CHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificityUltracentrifugationRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID15269299
PMCPMC1867636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.