ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2004
Increased sensitivity of the Roche COBAS AMPLICOR HCV test, version 2.0, using modified extraction techniques.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spontaneous and natural cytotoxicity receptor-mediated cytotoxicity are effector functions of distinct natural killer subsets in hepatitis C virus-infected chimpanzees.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Processing modifications were made to the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV version 2.0 assay to enhance sensitivity. Two methods of specimen concentration, centrifugation ("ultraspin") and cationic detergent plus silica membrane ("ultracolumn"), were compared to the standard method. The effect of these changes on assay sensitivity and specificity was examined using commercial hepatitis C virus (HCV) preparations. The limits of detection (LOD, defined as detection of HCV RNA in >/= 95% of replicates) of genotype 1a were 50, 12, and 6 by standard method, ultraspin and ultracolumn, respectively. For genotype 1b, the LOD was 25 IU/ml, 12 IU/ml, and 3 IU/ml; for 2b, it was 50, 12, and 3; for 3a, it was 25, 12, and 1.5; for 4 it was 18, 4, and 2; for 5a, it was 38, 9, and 2; and for 6a it was 47, 6, and 3. No false positives were detected after ultraspin when controls containing high or low HCV concentrations were alternated with normal human plasma. Plasmas in which HCV RNA was not detected by the standard assay were re-tested with modified methods to assess the effect of altered processing in clinical specimens. Three of 152 specimens with no detectable HCV RNA by the standard method were positive by ultraspin and 2 of 109 were positive by ultracolumn, suggesting that these methods may increase assay sensitivity in clinical specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.