Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15269297›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2004

High-resolution melting analysis for detection of internal tandem duplications.

Cecily P Vaughn, Kojo S J Elenitoba-Johnson

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cecily P VaughnDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 50 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Kojo S J Elenitoba-Johnson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) is a recently introduced closed-tube fluorescence-based method for rapid mutation screening and detection. However, all of the targets by which this technique has been validated thus far have had single-base substitutions, deletions, or similarly small mutational deviations from the wild-type sequence. In the current study, we sought to determine the feasibility of utilization of HRMA for the detection of larger sequence aberrations, using internal tandem duplications (ITD) in the juxtamembrane domain of the FLT3 gene as a model system. This gene is important in the growth and differentiation of hematopoietic progenitors and ITDs in this gene have been identified in a subset of poor-prognosis acute myelogenous leukemias (AML). DNA extracted from 62 AML samples was analyzed on a prototype high-resolution melting instrument. The samples interrogated for the FLT3 ITDs were subjected to post-amplification denaturation with frequent and regular fluorescence acquisition. The fluorescence versus temperature melting graphs generated were analyzed for deviation from the profiles reproducibly obtained for the wild-type samples. Results by HRMA were compared to results obtained using capillary electrophoresis-based fragment analysis, temperature gradient capillary electrophoresis detection, and sequencing of ITDs. FLT3 ITDs were detected in 13 of 62 AML samples with 100% concordance between the detection methods. This study demonstrates the utility of HRMA to rapidly and accurately screen samples for the presence of large sequence aberrations including FLT3 ITDs.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseDNA Mutational AnalysisElectrophoresis, Capillaryfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3Gene DuplicationHumansLeukemia, MyeloidMutationProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesTandem Repeat SequencesTransition TemperatureFLT3 protein, humanfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3Proto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID15269297
PMCPMC1867640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.