Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15266508›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery.

P S Edwards, A Lipp, A Holmes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01184196 (A Comparison of Chlorhexadine Gluconate Versus Povidone Iodine Surgical Preparation in Skin Bacterial Colony Counts for Elective Knee Replacement Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01184196 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

A Comparison of Chlorhexadine Gluconate Versus Povidone Iodine Surgical Preparation in Skin Bacterial Colony Counts for Elective Knee Replacement Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral DuPage HospitalRan2009 to 2012Enrolled55ConditionsArthroplasty, Knee Replacement, Replacement, Total Knee, Total Knee ReplacementArmsSwab area with Betadine, Swab area with ChloraPrep
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Pattern of Post-Operative Infections Among Oral Cavity Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Care Cancer Centre: A Prospective Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Preventing complications in dermatologic surgery: Presurgical concerns.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2015
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Prevention of chemical burns.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2008
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Iodine revisited.International wound journal · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P S EdwardsNational Patient Safety Agency, 4-8 Maple Street, London, UK, W1T 5HD.
A Lipp
A Holmes
University of South Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 15% of elective surgery patients and 30% of patients receiving contaminated or dirty surgery are estimated to develop post-operative wound infections. The costs of surgical wound infection can be considerable in financial as well as social terms. Preoperative skin antisepsis is performed to reduce the risk of post-operative wound infections by removing soil and transient organisms from the skin. Antiseptics are thought to be both toxic to bacteria and aid their mechanical removal. The effectiveness of preoperative skin preparation is thought to be dependent on both the antiseptic used and the method of application, however it is unclear whether preoperative skin antisepsis actually reduces post-operative wound infection and if so which antiseptic is most effective.

objectivesTo determine whether preoperative skin antisepsis reduces post-operative surgical wound infection. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Trials Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in April 2004. In addition we handsearched journals, conference proceedings and bibliographies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of preoperative skin antiseptics applied immediately prior to incision in clean surgery. There were no restrictions based on language, date or publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently undertook data extraction and assessment of study quality. Pooling was inappropriate and trials are discussed in a narrative review. MAIN

resultsWe identified six eligible RCTs evaluating preoperative antiseptics. There was significant heterogeneity in the comparisons and the results could not be pooled. In one study, infection rates were significantly lower when skin was prepared using chlorhexidine compared with iodine. There was no evidence of a benefit in four trials associated with the use of iodophor impregnated drapes. REVIEWERS'

conclusionsThere is insufficient research examining the effects of preoperative skin antiseptics to allow conclusions to be drawn regarding their effects on post-operative surgical wound infections. Further research is needed.

Indexed as

Preoperative CareAnti-Infective Agents, LocalHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Infective Agents, Local

Identifiers

PMID15266508
OpenAlexW4234855338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.