SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01184196 (A Comparison of Chlorhexadine Gluconate Versus Povidone Iodine Surgical Preparation in Skin Bacterial Colony Counts for Elective Knee Replacement Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Comparison of Chlorhexadine Gluconate Versus Povidone Iodine Surgical Preparation in Skin Bacterial Colony Counts for Elective Knee Replacement Surgery
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Systematic review and cost analysis comparing use of chlorhexidine with use of iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site infection.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2010Pooled it
- Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Surgical Preparation Solutions in Hand Surgery.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2017Trial
- Efficiency of Local Antiseptic Alkosol (Ethanol, Isopropanol-30g and Ortophenilphenol) and Povidone Iodide on the Incidence Of Surgical Site Infection After Inguinal Hernioplasty.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Does single application of topical chloramphenicol to high risk sutured wounds reduce incidence of wound infection after minor surgery? Prospective randomised placebo controlled double blind trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2009Trial
- Efficacy and safety of chlorhexidine vs. povidone-iodine for vaginal antisepsis in surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Pattern of Post-Operative Infections Among Oral Cavity Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Care Cancer Centre: A Prospective Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022Article
- Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Post-Surgical Mediastinitis in Adults Consensus Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular Infections (Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Preventing complications in dermatologic surgery: Presurgical concerns.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2021Review
- Article
- [Epidemiology and prevention of prosthetic joint infection].Der Orthopade · 2015Review
- Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2015Review
- Surgical site infections: epidemiology and microbiological aspects in trauma and orthopaedic surgery.International wound journal · 2013Review
- Anti-infective treatment in HIV-infected patients during perioperative period.AIDS research and therapy · 2012Article
- Prevention and treatment of surgical site infection in HIV-infected patients.BMC infectious diseases · 2012Article
- Prevention of deep infection in joint replacement surgery.Acta orthopaedica · 2010Review
- Prevention of chemical burns.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2008Article
- Povidone-iodine: use in hand disinfection, skin preparation and antiseptic irrigation.International wound journal · 2008Review
- Iodine revisited.International wound journal · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 15% of elective surgery patients and 30% of patients receiving contaminated or dirty surgery are estimated to develop post-operative wound infections. The costs of surgical wound infection can be considerable in financial as well as social terms. Preoperative skin antisepsis is performed to reduce the risk of post-operative wound infections by removing soil and transient organisms from the skin. Antiseptics are thought to be both toxic to bacteria and aid their mechanical removal. The effectiveness of preoperative skin preparation is thought to be dependent on both the antiseptic used and the method of application, however it is unclear whether preoperative skin antisepsis actually reduces post-operative wound infection and if so which antiseptic is most effective.
objectivesTo determine whether preoperative skin antisepsis reduces post-operative surgical wound infection. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Trials Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in April 2004. In addition we handsearched journals, conference proceedings and bibliographies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of preoperative skin antiseptics applied immediately prior to incision in clean surgery. There were no restrictions based on language, date or publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently undertook data extraction and assessment of study quality. Pooling was inappropriate and trials are discussed in a narrative review. MAIN
resultsWe identified six eligible RCTs evaluating preoperative antiseptics. There was significant heterogeneity in the comparisons and the results could not be pooled. In one study, infection rates were significantly lower when skin was prepared using chlorhexidine compared with iodine. There was no evidence of a benefit in four trials associated with the use of iodophor impregnated drapes. REVIEWERS'
conclusionsThere is insufficient research examining the effects of preoperative skin antiseptics to allow conclusions to be drawn regarding their effects on post-operative surgical wound infections. Further research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.