Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15266496›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Pre and post operative medical therapy for endometriosis surgery.

C Yap, S Furness, C Farquhar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02676713 (Activating Blood, Dredging Liver and Nourishing Kidney Sequential Treatment for Endometriosis Associated Infertility - a Randomized Double-blind Placebo Controlled Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02676713 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Activating Blood, Dredging Liver and Nourishing Kidney Sequential Treatment for Endometriosis Associated Infertility - a Randomized Double-blind Placebo Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical SciencesRan2014 to 2017Enrolled204ConditionsEndometriosis, InfertilityArmspre-ovulation Decoction, post-ovulation Decoction, pre-ovulation Decoction(placebo), post-ovulation Decoction(placebo)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 262 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical practice guidelines for endometriosis in Japan (The 3rd edition).The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pre- and postsurgical medical therapy for endometriosis surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Endometriosis: the effects of dienogest.BMJ clinical evidence · 2015
    Pooled it
  7. Endometriosis: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  8. Endometriosis.BMJ clinical evidence · 2010
    Pooled it
  9. Danazol for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Endometriosis in the era of precision medicine and impact on sexual and reproductive health across the lifespan and in diverse populations.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2023
    Review
  19. Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometriosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

C YapDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, Singapore, 169608.
S Furness
C Farquhar
Mount Elizabeth Hospital · SGPrincess Anne Hospital · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is a common gynaecological condition which affects approximately 10% of women of reproductive age (Askenazi 1997). There is a range of symptoms and most commonly women present with dysmenorrhoea, pelvic pain, infertility or a pelvic mass. Direct visualisation and biopsy during laparoscopy or laparotomy is the gold standard diagnostic test for this condition and enables the gynaecologist to identify the location, extent and severity of the disease. Surgical therapy can be performed concurrently with diagnostic surgery and may include removal (excision) or destruction (ablation) of endometriotic tissue, division of adhesions and removal of endometriotic cysts. Laparoscopic excision or ablation of endometriosis has been shown to be effective in the management of pain in mild-moderate endometriosis. Adjunctive medical treatment pre or post-operatively may prolong the symptom-free interval.

objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of systemic medical therapies used for hormonal suppression before or after surgery for endometriosis, or before and after surgery for endometriosis in the eradication of endometriosis, improvement of symptoms, pregnancy rates and overall tolerability by comparing them with no treatment or placebo. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility group trials register (searched 10 September 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2003), EMBASE (January 1985 to September 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were included if they were randomised controlled trials of the use of systemic medical therapies for hormonal suppression before or after, or before and after surgery for endometriosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and quality assessment was performed independently by using relative risk or weighted mean difference and 95% confidence intervals. MAIN

resultsEleven trials were included in the review. One study comparing pre-surgical medical therapy with surgery alone showed a significant improvement in AFS scores in the medical therapy group (WMD -9.60, 95% CI -11.42 to -7.78) but this may or may not be associated with better outcomes for the patients. Post surgical hormonal suppression of endometriosis compared to surgery alone (either no medical therapy or placebo) showed no benefit for the outcomes of pain or pregnancy rates but a significant improvement in disease recurrence (AFS scores (WMD -2.30, 95% CI -4.02 to -0.58)). There were no trials identified in the search that compared hormonal suppression of endometriosis before and after surgery with surgery alone. There is no significant difference between pre surgery hormonal suppression and post surgery hormonal suppression for the outcome of pain in the one trial identified (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.07). Information concerning AFS scores and ease of surgery was reported only as a descriptive summary so any difference between the groups can not be quantified from the information in the report of this trial. REVIEWERS'

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence from the studies identified to conclude that hormonal suppression in association with surgery for endometriosis is associated with a significant benefit with regard to any of the outcomes identified. There may be a benefit of improvement in AFS scores with the pre-surgical use of medical therapy. The possible benefit should be weighed in the context of the adverse effects and costs of these therapies.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantEndometriosisFemaleHormonesHumansPostoperative PeriodPreoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHormones

Identifiers

PMID15266496
PMCPMC6984629
OpenAlexW1605802837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.