Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15266491›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Anti-IgE for chronic asthma in adults and children.

S Walker, M Monteil, K Phelan, T J Lasserson, E H Walters

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

S WalkerNational Respiratory Training Centre, The Athenaeum, 10 Church Street, Warwick, UK, CV34 4AB.
M Monteil
K Phelan
T J Lasserson
E H Walters
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USRespiratory Clinical Trials · AUSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOmalizumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody directed against immunoglobulin E (IgE) to inhibit the immune system's response to allergen exposure. Omalizumab is directed against the binding site of IgE for its high affinity Fc receptor. It prevents free serum IgE from attaching to mast cells and other effector cells and prevents IgE mediated inflammatory changes.

objectivesTo determine the efficacy of anti-IgE in patients with allergic asthma SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Asthma trials register (February 2003) for potentially relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials examining anti-IgE administered in any manner for any duration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and extracted and entered data. Three modes of administration were identified from the published literature (inhaled, intravenous and subcutaneous injection). Subgroup analysis was performed by asthma severity. Data were extracted from published and unpublished sources. MAIN

resultsEight trials were included in the review, contributing a total of 2037 mild to severe allergic asthmatic participants with high levels of IgE. Treatment with intravenous and subcutaneous Omalizumab significantly reduced free IgE compared with placebo. Omalizumab led to a significant reduction in inhaled steroid consumption compared with placebo: -114 mcg/day (95% CI -150 to -78.13, two trials). There were significant increases in the number of participants who were able to reduce steroids by over 50%: odds ratio (OR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02 to 3.10 (four trials); or completely withdraw their daily steroid intake: OR 2.50, 95%CI 2.00 to 3.13 (four trials). Participants treated with Omalizumab were less likely to suffer an asthma exacerbation with treatment as an adjunct to steroids (OR 0.49, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.64, four trials), or as a steroid tapering agent (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.60, four trials). REVIEWERS'

conclusionsOmalizumab was significantly more effective than placebo at increasing the numbers of patients who were able to reduce or withdraw their inhaled steroids, but the mean difference in steroid consumption achieved with Omalizumab was of debatable clinical value. The impressive effects observed in control groups bring into question the true effect of Omalizumab. Omalizumab was effective in reducing asthma exacerbations as an adjunctive therapy to inhaled steroids. Omalizumab was well tolerated, although the safety profile requires longer term assessment. Patient and physician assessment of the drug was positive. Further assessment in paediatric and severe adult populations is necessary, as is double-dummy comparison with inhaled corticosteroids.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaChildChronic DiseaseHumansImmunoglobulin EOmalizumabRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunoglobulin EOmalizumab

Identifiers

PMID15266491
OpenAlexW4233784740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.