SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Anticholinergic agents for chronic asthma in adults.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness of long term drug treatment strategies to prevent asthma exacerbations: network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2014Pooled it
- Therapeutic Effects of a Long-Acting Cholinergic Receptor Blocker, Tiotropium Bromide, on Asthma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Trial
- Efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/albuterol compared with albuterol in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2016Trial
- Tiotropium bromide step-up therapy for adults with uncontrolled asthma.The New England journal of medicine · 2010Trial
- Predictors of asthma exacerbation between high and low blood eosinophil counts.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- GRespiratory research · 2024Review
- Bronchodilator Responsiveness Measured by Spirometry and Impulse Oscillometry in Patients with Asthma After Short Acting Antimuscarinic and/or Beta-2-Agonists Inhalation.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2024Article
- Might It Be Appropriate to Anticipate the Use of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists in Asthma?Drugs · 2023Article
- Future perspectives of anticholinergics for the treatment of asthma in adults and children.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019Review
- Tiotropium for the Treatment of Asthma: Patient Selection and Perspectives.Canadian respiratory journal · 2018Review
- The evidence on tiotropium bromide in asthma: from the rationale to the bedside.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2017Review
- Long-acting muscarinic antagonists: a potential add-on therapy in the treatment of asthma?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2016Review
- Tiotropium in asthma: what is the evidence and how does it fit in?The World Allergy Organization journal · 2016Review
- The Danish National Database for Asthma: establishing clinical quality indicators.European clinical respiratory journal · 2016Review
- Guidelines for diagnosis and management of bronchial asthma: Joint ICS/NCCP (I) recommendations.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2015Article
- Anticholinergics/antimuscarinic drugs in asthma.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2014Review
- Is there a rationale and role for long-acting anticholinergic bronchodilators in asthma?NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2014Article
- Emerging role of long acting muscarinic antagonists for asthma.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Review
- The asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome: pharmacotherapeutic considerations.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2013Review
- The role of tiotropium in the management of asthma.Asia Pacific allergy · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnticholinergic agents such as ipratropium bromide are sometimes used in the treatment of chronic asthma. They effect bronchodilation and have also been used in combination with beta2-agonists in the management of chronic asthma.
objectivesTo examine the effectiveness of anticholinergic agents versus placebo and in comparison with beta2-agonists or as adjunctive therapy to beta2-agonists. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Airways Group asthma and wheeze database was searched with a pre-defined search strategy. Searches were current as of August 2003. Reference lists of articles were also examined. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials or quasi-randomised trials were considered for inclusion. Studies assessing an anticholinergic agent versus placebo or in combination/comparison with beta2-agonists were included. In practice, all beta2-agonists were short acting. Short-term (less than 24 hours duration) and longer-term studies were separated; the latter are reported in this review and the former in the review, "Anticholinergic agents for chronic asthma in adults short term". DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed abstracts for retrieval of full text articles. Papers were then assessed for suitability for inclusion in the review. Data from included studies were extracted by two reviewers and entered into the software package (RevMan 4.2). We contacted authors for missing data and some responded. Adverse effect data were analysed if reported in the included studies. MAIN
resultsThe studies analysed were in two groups: those comparing anticholinergics with placebo and those comparing the combination of anticholinergics with short acting beta2-agonists versus short acting beta2-agonists alone. The former group had 13 studies involving 205 participants included in this review, and the latter 9 studies involving 440 patients. Generally methodological quality was poorly reported, and there were some reservations with respect to the quality of the studies. Despite the limited number of studies that could be combined, anticholinergic agents in comparison with placebo resulted in more favourable symptom scores particularly in respect of daytime dyspnoea (WMD -0.09 (95%CI -0.14, -0.04, 3 studies, 59 patients). Daily peak flow measurements also showed a statistically significant improvement for the anticholinergic (e.g. morning PEF: WMD =14.38 litres/min (95%CI 7.69, 21.08; 3 studies, 59 patients). However the clinical significance is small and in terms of peak flow measurements equates to approximately a 7% increase over placebo. The more clinically relevant comparison of a combination of anticholinergic plus short acting beta2-agonist versus short acting beta2-agonist alone gave no evidence in respect of symptom scores or peak flow rates of any significant differences between the two regimes. Again there are reservations with respect to the quality of the information from which these conclusions are drawn. REVIEWERS'
conclusionsOverall this review provides no justification for routinely introducing anticholinergics as part of add-on treatment for patients whose asthma is not well controlled on standard therapies. This does not exclude the possibility that there may be a sub-group of patients who derive some benefit and a trial of treatment in individual patients may still be justified. The role of long term anticholinergics such as tiotropium bromide has yet to be established in patients with asthma and any future trials might draw on the messages derived from this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.