SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Antibiotics for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in non-pregnant women.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
128 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 417 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of information technology interventions for optimizing antibiotic prescribing in urinary tract infections: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Role of Probiotics for Recurrent UTIs in the Twenty-First Century: a Systematic Review of Literature.Current urology reports · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Probiotics for preventing urinary tract infections in adults and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Chinese herbal medicine for treating recurrent urinary tract infections in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Oestrogens for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in postmenopausal women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Efficacy of D-mannose as prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaPooled it
- Whole cranberry fruit powder supplement reduces the incidence of culture-confirmed urinary tract infections in females with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection: A 6-month multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Trial
- A post-trial follow-up study of pentosan polysulfate monotherapy on preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in women.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Feasibility and Research Insights From a Randomized Controlled Trial for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Prevention in Postmenopausal Women Using Vaginal Estrogen Therapy.Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery · 2022Trial
- Alternative to prophylactic antibiotics for the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: multicentre, open label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Trial
- Methenamine hippurate compared with trimethoprim for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections: a randomized clinical trial.International urogynecology journal · 2022Trial
- Effect of Increased Daily Water Intake in Premenopausal Women With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Prulifloxacin vs fosfomycin for prophylaxis in female patients with recurrent UTIs: a non-inferiority trial.International urogynecology journal · 2014Trial
- D-mannose powder for prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: a randomized clinical trial.World journal of urology · 2014Trial
- Women's views about management and cause of urinary tract infection: qualitative interview study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010Trial
68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary tract infection (UTI) is a common health care problem. Recurrent UTI (RUTI) in healthy non-pregnant women is defined as three or more episodes of UTI during a twelve month period. Long-term antibiotics have been proposed as a prevention strategy for RUTI.
objectivesTo determine the efficacy (during and after) and safety of prophylactic antibiotics used to prevent uncomplicated RUTI in adult non-pregnant women. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE (1966-April 2004), EMBASE (1980-January 2003), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials( in The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004) and reference lists of retrieved articles SELECTION CRITERIA: Any published randomised controlled trial where antibiotics were used as prophylactic therapy in RUTI. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN
resultsNineteen studies involving 1120 women were eligible for inclusion. Antibiotic versus antibiotic (10 trials, 430 women): During active prophylaxis the rate range of microbiological recurrence patient-year (MRPY) was 0 to 0.9 person-year in the antibiotic group against 0.8 to 3.6 with placebo. The RR of having one microbiological recurrence (MR) was 0.21 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.34), favouring antibiotic and the NNT was 1.85. For clinical recurrences (CRPY) the RR was 0.15 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.28). The NNT was 1.85. The RR of having one MR after prophylaxis was 0.82 (95% CI 0.44 to 1.53). The RR for severe side effects was 1.58 (95% CI 0.47 to 5.28) and for other side effects the RR was 1.78 (CI 1.06 to 3.00) favouring placebo. Side effects included vaginal and oral candidiasis and gastrointestinal symptoms. Antibiotic versus antibiotic (eight trials, 513 women): These trials were not pooled. Weekly pefloxacin was more effective than monthly. The RR for MR was 0.31(95% CI 0.19 to 0.52). There was no significant difference in MR between continuous daily and postcoital ciprofloxacin. REVIEWERS'
conclusionsContinuous antibiotic prophylaxis for 6-12 months reduced the rate of UTI during prophylaxis when compared to placebo. After prophylaxis two studies showed nodifference between groups. There were more adverse events in the antibiotic group. One RCT compared postcoital versus continuous daily ciprofloxacin and found no significant difference in rates of UTIs, suggesting that postcoital treatment could be offered to woman who have UTI associated with sexual intercourse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.