Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15266439›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Surgery for deep venous incompetence.

S C Hardy, G Riding, A Abidia

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgery for deep venous insufficiency.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Surgery for deep venous incompetence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S C HardyVascular Surgery, Blackburn Royal Infirmary, Bolton Road, Blackburn, UK, BB2 3LR.
G Riding
A Abidia
Blackburn College · USPrincess Alexandra Hospital · GBWythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic deep venous incompetence (DVI) is caused by incompetent vein valves and/or the blockage of large calibre leg veins, with a range of symptoms including recurrent ulcers, pain and swelling.

objectivesTo establish the effectiveness of various surgical procedures for treating DVI. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were identified through the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group's trials register, reference lists of relevant studies, and contact with principal investigators of identified trials and world experts in deep venous surgery. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of surgical treatment for patients with DVI. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Reviewers extracted data independently. Outcome measures included ambulatory venous pressure (AVP) and venous refill time (VRT). MAIN

resultsThree trials were included, one trial was excluded. Two trials compared external valvuloplasty using limited anterior plication (LAP) in combination with ligation (L) of incompetent superficial veins (L+LAP) against ligation only (L). The other trial compared external valvuloplasty and ligation (V+L) of incompetent superficial veins against ligation only (L). Trial participants had primary valvular incompetence with mild to moderate symptoms but no venous ulcers.L+LAP produced significant improvement in AVP: the mean difference between L+LAP and L groups was -15 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) -20.9 to -9.0) at one year and -15 mm Hg (95% CI -21 to -8.9) at ten years.AVP values after surgery remained relatively high. Nine of eleven valves repaired remained competent after two years of follow up. No complications occurred. The overall mean score for clinical outcome was +2 (moderate improvement) in the L+LAP group compared with +1 (mild improvement) in the L group. Patients with deteriorating clinical dynamics over the five years preceding surgery had a significantly higher rate of improvement in clinical condition in V+L compared to L (81% versus 51%; p < 0.05) after seven years follow-up. Patients with stable preoperative clinical dynamics demonstrated a similar rate of improvement in both groups (96% versus 90%; p> 0.1). AVPs were not performed. REVIEWERS'

conclusionsThese results indicate that ligation and valvuloplasty may have produced a moderate and sustained improvement for seven to ten years after surgery, in patients with mild to moderate DVI caused by primary valvular incompetence. However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the treatment to this subgroup of patients, as the trials were small, used different methods of valvuloplasty and different methods of assessment.

Indexed as

HumansLegPeripheral Vascular DiseasesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVenous Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID15266439
OpenAlexW4205181560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.