SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00482560 (Analgesic Effect of Breast Feeding vs Sucrose in Neonatal Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analgesic Effect of Breast Feeding vs Sucrose in Neonatal Screening
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 883 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sucrose analgesia for heel-lance procedures in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Kangaroo Care for Relieving Neonatal Pain Caused by Invasive Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) - short version.German medical science : GMS e-journal · 2015Guideline
- Sweet-tasting solutions for needle-related procedural pain in infants one month to one year of age.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Guidelines for procedural pain in the newborn.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2009Guideline
- Trial of repeated analgesia with Kangaroo Mother Care (TRAKC Trial).BMC pediatrics · 2013Trial
- A multidimensional approach to pain assessment in critically ill infants during a painful procedure.The Clinical journal of pain · 2013Trial
- Oral sucrose for heel lance increases adenosine triphosphate use and oxidative stress in preterm neonates.The Journal of pediatrics · 2013Trial
- Warmth is analgesic in healthy newborns.Pain · 2012Trial
- Effect of topical anesthesia and age on pain scores during retinopathy of prematurity screening.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2010Trial
- Co-bedding as a Comfort measure For Twins undergoing painful procedures (CComForT Trial).BMC pediatrics · 2009Trial
- Effectiveness of sucrose analgesia in newborns undergoing painful medical procedures.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008Trial
- A randomized controlled trial of sucrose and/or pacifier as analgesia for infants receiving venipuncture in a pediatric emergency department.BMC pediatrics · 2007Trial
- Trial
- Can oral sucrose reduce the pain and distress associated with screening for retinopathy of prematurity?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2005Trial
- Oral sucrose and a pacifier for pain relief during simple procedures in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial.Annals of Saudi medicineTrial
- Quantification of Infant Distress Across Serial Clubfoot Casting Visits: A Prospective Pilot Study.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Review
- Evolutionary and neuropsychological perspectives on addictive behaviors and addictive substances: relevance to the "food addiction" construct.Substance abuse and rehabilitation · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManagement of pain for neonates is less than optimal. The administration of sucrose with and without non-nutritive sucking (pacifiers) has been the most frequently studied non-pharmacological intervention for relief of procedural pain in neonates.
objectivesTo determine the efficacy, effect of dose, and safety of sucrose for relieving procedural pain as assessed by validated individual pain indicators and composite pain scores. SEARCH STRATEGY: Standard methods as per the Neonatal Collaborative Review Group. A MEDLINE search was carried out for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 1966 - March 2004, EMBASE from 1980-2004 and search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004). Key words and (MeSH) terms included infant/newborn, pain, analgesia and sucrose. Language restrictions were not imposed. Bibliographies, personal files, the most recent relevant neonatal and pain journals and recent major pediatric pain conference proceedings were searched manually. Unpublished studies, or studies reported only as abstracts, were not included. Additional information from published studies was obtained. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs in which term and/or preterm neonates (postnatal age maximum of 28 days after reaching 40 weeks corrected gestational age) received sucrose via oral syringe, NG-tube, dropper or pacifier for procedural pain from heel lance or venepuncture. In the control group, water, pacifier or positioning/containing were used. Studies in which the painful stimulus was circumcision were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed according to the methods of the Neonatal Collaborative Review Group. Quality measures included blinding of randomization, blinding of intervention, completeness of follow up and blinding of outcome measurement. Data were abstracted and independently checked for accuracy by the three investigators. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The statistical package (RevMan 4.2) of the Cochrane Collaboration was used. For meta-analysis, a weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed effects model was reported for continuous outcome measures. MAIN
resultsForty-four studies were identified for possible inclusion in this review. Seven studies reported only as abstracts, and sixteen additional studies were excluded, leaving 21 studies (1,616 infants) included in this review. Sucrose in a wide variety of dosages was generally found to decrease physiologic (heart rate) and behavioural (the mean percent time crying, total cry duration, duration of first cry, and facial action) pain indicators and composite pain scores in neonates undergoing heel stick or venepuncture. When pain scores (Premature Infant Pain Profiles) were pooled across 3 studies (Gibbins 2001; Johnston 1999a; Stevens 1999), they were significantly reduced in infants who were given sucrose (dose range 0.012 g to 0.12 g) compared to the control group, [WMD -1.64 (95% CI -2.47,- 0.81); p = 0.0001] at 30 seconds and [WMD -2.05, (95% CI -3.08, -1.02); p = 0.00010] at 60 seconds after heel lance. When results for change in heart rate were pooled for two studies (Haouari 1995, Isik 2000), there were no significant differences between changes in heart rate for infants given sucrose (dose range 0.5 g to 0.6 g) compared to the control group, [WMD 0.90 (95% CI -5.81, 7.61); p = 0.8] at one minute and [WMD -6.20 (95% CI -15.27, 2.88); p = 0.18] at three minutes after heel lance. REVIEWERS'
conclusionsSucrose is safe and effective for reducing procedural pain from single painful events (heel lance, venepuncture). There was inconsistency in the dose of sucrose that was effective (dose range of 0.012 g to 0.12 g), and therefore an optimal dose to be used in preterm and/or term infants could not be identified. The use of repeated administrations of sucrose in neonates needs to be investigated as does the use of sucrose in combination with other behavioural (e.g., facilitated tucking, kangaroo care) and pharmacologic (e.g., morphine, fentanyl) interventions. Use of sucrose in neonates who are of very low birth weight, unstable and/or ventilated also needs to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.