SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Low-molecular-weight heparins or heparinoids versus standard unfractionated heparin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients (excluding stroke and myocardial infarction).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Anticoagulants for preventing recurrence following presumed non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- A systematic review of Cochrane anticoagulation reviews.Medscape journal of medicine · 2009Pooled it
- Dengzhanhua preparations for acute cerebral infarction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- [European Stroke Organisation 2008 guidelines for managing acute cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack : part 2].Der Nervenarzt · 2008Guideline
- Low-molecular-weight heparin compared with aspirin for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke in Asian patients with large artery occlusive disease: a randomised study.The Lancet. Neurology · 2007Trial
- Intracranial atherosclerotic disease.Neurobiology of disease · 2019Review
- Appropriateness of Pharmacologic Prophylaxis against Deep Vein Thrombosis in Medical Wards of an Ethiopian Referral Hospital.International journal of vascular medicine · 2018Article
- Blood coagulation factor XII--a neglected player in stroke pathophysiology.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2012Review
- Stroke management.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2011Article
- Antithrombotic medication for cardioembolic stroke prevention.Stroke research and treatment · 2011Article
- Variation in physician deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis attitudes and practices at an academic tertiary care center.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2010Article
- Antithrombotic therapy in cardiac embolism.Current cardiology reviews · 2010Article
- [Stroke and atrial fibrillation].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2009Review
- Targeting coagulation factor XII provides protection from pathological thrombosis in cerebral ischemia without interfering with hemostasis.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2006Article
- Aspirin and heparin in acute ischaemic stroke in older patients.Drugs & aging · 1999Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost ischaemic strokes are caused by blood clots blocking an artery in the brain. Clot prevention with anticoagulant therapy could have a significant impact on patient survival, disability and stroke recurrence.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effect of anticoagulant therapy versus control in the early treatment of patients with acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register (last searched 30 October 2003). For previous updates of this review, we searched the register of the Antithrombotic Trialists' (ATT) Collaboration, consulted MedStrategy (1995), and contacted relevant drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing early anticoagulant therapy (started within two weeks of stroke onset) with control in patients with acute presumed or confirmed ischaemic stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data. MAIN
resultsTwenty-two trials involving 23,547 patients were included. The quality of the trials varied considerably. The anticoagulants tested were standard unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, heparinoids, oral anticoagulants, and thrombin inhibitors. Based on nine trials (22,570 patients) there was no evidence that anticoagulant therapy reduced the odds of death from all causes (odds ratio (OR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 to 1.12) at the end of follow-up. Similarly, based on six trials (21,966 patients), there was no evidence that anticoagulants reduced the odds of being dead or dependent at the end of follow-up (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.04). Although anticoagulant therapy was associated with about 9 fewer recurrent ischaemic strokes per 1000 patients treated (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.88), it was also associated with a similar sized 9 per 1000 increase in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages (OR = 2.52; 95% CI 1.92 to 3.30). Similarly, anticoagulants avoided about 4 pulmonary emboli per 1000 (OR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.81), but this benefit was offset by an extra 9 major extracranial haemorrhages per 1000 (OR = 2.99; 95% CI 2.24 to 3.99). Sensitivity analyses did not identify a particular type of anticoagulant regimen or patient characteristic associated with net benefit. REVIEWERS'
conclusionsImmediate anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke is not associated with net short- or long-term benefit. The data from this review do not support the routine use of any type of anticoagulant in acute ischaemic stroke. People treated with anticoagulants had less chance of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) following their stroke, but these sorts of blood clots are not very common, and may be prevented in other ways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.