ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2004
Concurrent Fusarium chlamydosporum and Microsphaeropsis arundinis infections in a cat.
Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neotypification ofFungal systematics and evolution · 2019Article
- Granulomatous pododermatitis in the digits caused by Fusarium proliferatum in a cat.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2014Article
- Localised microsphaeropsis arundinis infection of the subcutis of a cat.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2010Article
- Phaeohyphomycotic soft tissue infections caused by the coelomycetous fungus Microsphaeropsis arundinis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 7-year-old cat was presented initially with multiple draining sinuses on the metatarsal region of its right hindlimb. Another lesion had appeared at the same time on the fifth proximal interphalangeal joint of the left forelimb. Histopathological examination of a biopsy from the right hindlimb lesion revealed chronic pyogranulomatous inflammation associated with yeast-like bodies and septate mycelia; a fungus was cultured on conventional media but not identified further. Culture of a swab collected from the left forelimb lesion demonstrated a pigmented fungus, also not characterised further. Although there was initially a favourable response to ketoconazole (Nizoral, Janssen-Cilag Pty. Ltd) and beta-lactam therapy, the infection in the hind limb relapsed subsequently, and Fusarium chlamydosporum was cultured from deep biopsy specimens. Clinical improvement followed debridement and itraconazole (Sporanox, Janssen-Cilag Pty. Ltd; 100 mg orally once daily), however amputation of the limb represented the best chance for a cure. The cat made an uncomplicated recovery following surgery and remained well for five months until the lesion on the left forelimb recurred. Amputation of the distal fourth digit was then performed, and the resected tissue submitted for culture. The dematiaceous fungus Microsphaeropsis arundinis was subsequently cultured. The cat remained well for several months, until a further F. chlamydosporum infection developed on the body wall. This was excised 7 months ago, and no lesions have recurred in this area. Importantly, this is the first reported case of M. arundinis infection in a mammalian host.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.