Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15265455›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2004

Fungal Endocarditis.

Eyal Nadir, Ethan Rubinstein

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Medical mycology case reports · 2018
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eyal NadirInfectious Diseases Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Tel-Aviv University, School of Medicine, Israel. ethan.rubinstein@sheba.health.gov.il
Ethan Rubinstein
Sheba Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in medicine have caused fungal endocarditis (FE) to be a more common disease entity. Many fungi are potential pathogens in FE, although Candida species and Aspergillus species are the most common. Valvular heart disease is the necessary underlying condition for FE, with intravenous devices and antibiotic use being the predisposing factors for yeast endocarditis, whereas immunosuppression in patients with valvulopathy predisposes for mold endocarditis. Better prognosis of FE depends on fast and accurate diagnosis and subsequent treatment. Echocardiography was the most valuable recent technique in the past two decades that allowed early diagnosis of FE and is probably responsible for the improved prognosis of patients with FE. In the future, development of nonculture-based diagnostic tests may further improve the sensitivity, specificity, and rapidity of microbiologic diagnosis of FE. Novel approaches in treatment, such as new antifungal drugs, also may assist in achieving cure and further improving the prognosis of this disease entity.

Identifiers

PMID15265455
OpenAlexW3190322245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.