ReviewDrugs & aging2004
Strategies to increase HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor use after acute myocardial infarction.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery disease with its accompanying complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the major causes of death in the modern world. A variety of both primary and secondary prevention strategies have been developed for the treatment of acute MI. One of the more important of these strategies is the prescription of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have the potential to positively affect the outcome of acute MI in a variety of ways including the reduction of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels and stabilisation of the atherosclerotic plaque. Multiple large randomised clinical trials have documented the potential of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors to reduce both short- and long-term mortality after acute MI. This benefit exists regardless of age, gender, clinical presentation, or even baseline lipid levels. However, despite this overwhelming amount of evidence supporting the use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the post-MI setting, multiple studies have documented the presence of a significant 'treatment gap'. Indeed, often, less than half of acute MI patients who would benefit from HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy actually receive it. The reasons for the low utilisation of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the acute MI patient are many, but may include poor communication, the high cost of treatment, the lack of associated symptoms and confusion regarding appropriate lipid levels to target. One approach that has been tried to address these issues is the development of institutional programmes specifically targeted to increase the use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in acute MI patients. These programmes, often managed by nurses or pharmacists, have been piloted in several institutions. They have been effectively implemented in both inpatient and outpatient settings. In most cases they have been implemented without a great increase in expense. They have often increased the use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors to >90%. Most importantly, they have documented a significant improvement in the long-term survival of acute MI patients. Based on these preliminary studies, it is recommended that the implementation of these strategies be considered by most healthcare institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.