ArticleFolia microbiologica2004
Evolutionary relatedness between glycolytic enzymes most frequently occurring in genomes.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sugar ABC transporter repertoires predict ecological dynamics in gut microbiome communities.Research square · 2026Article
- Testis-specific glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase: origin and evolution.BMC evolutionary biology · 2011Article
- Three rounds (1R/2R/3R) of genome duplications and the evolution of the glycolytic pathway in vertebrates.BMC biology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than 100 sequenced genomes were searched for genes coding for the enzymes involved in glycolysis in an effort to find the most frequently occurring ones. Triosephosphate isomerase (TIM), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPD), phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) and enolase (ENOL) were found to be present in 90 investigated genomes all together. The final set consisted of 80 prokaryotic and 10 eukaryotic genomes. Of the 80 prokaryotic genomes, 73 were from Bacteria, 7 from Archaea. Two microbial genomes were also from Eucarya (yeasts). Eight genomes of nonmicrobial origin were included for comparison. The amino acid sequences of TIMs, GAPDs, PGKs and ENOLs were collected and aligned, and their individual as well as concatenated evolutionary trees were constructed and discussed. The trees clearly demonstrate a closer relatedness between Eucarya and Archaea (especially the concatenated tree) but they do not support the hypothesis that eukaryotic glycolytic enzymes should be closely related to their alpha-proteobacterial counterparts. Phylogenetic analyses further reveal that although the taxonomic groups (e.g., alpha-proteobacteria, gamma-proteobacteria, firmicutes, actinobacteria, etc.) form their more or less compact clusters in the trees, the inter-clade relationships between the trees are not conserved at all. On the other hand, several examples of conservative relatedness separating some clades of the same taxonomic groups were observed, e.g., Buchnera along with Wigglesworthia and the rest of gamma-proteobacteria, or mycoplasmas and the rest of firmicutes. The results support the view that these glycolytic enzymes may have their own evolutionary history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15259764What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.