Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15258841›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2004

[What is needed to develop a headache? Anatomical and pathophysiological implications].

U Reuter, A May

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

U ReuterNeurologische Klinik, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin. uwe.reuter@charite.de
A May
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shared anatomical and physiological substrate for headache syndromes is the neural innervation of the cranial circulation. Evidence suggests, that the observed dilatation of vessels in trigeminal pain is not inherent to a specific headache syndrome but rather a feature of the physiology of the trigeminal neural innervation of the cranial circulation. Moreover, the impact of vascular changes for the generation of headaches remains elusive. The trigeminal nerve innervates blood vessels within ipsilateral meninges. Upon activation neuropeptides such as CGRP are released. Blockade of both the trigeminal nerve system and neuropeptides are crucial targets for headache alleviating drugs. While these mechanisms are well known the events within and outside the CNS which initiate headaches are poorly understood. This article will review the anatomy and physiology of the trigeminovascular system which demand renewed consideration of the neural influences in many primary headaches.

Indexed as

BrainCerebrovascular CirculationHeadacheHumans

Identifiers

PMID15258841
OpenAlexW149272955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.