Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15258748›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2004

[Fecal incontinence].

J Braun, S Willis

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J BraunChirurgische Klinik, Rotes Kreuz Krankenhaus, St. Pauli Deich 24, 28199 Bremen, Germany. braun@roteskreuzkrankenhaus.de
S Willis
Krankenhaus vom Roten Kreuz · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence requires exact understanding of the anatomic and pathophysiologic principles involved and demands a methodical, stepwise approach. Despite the potential appeal of surgical intervention, a considerable number of patients can be helped by comparatively simple, noninvasive measures. Initial treatment should be medical, including biofeedback in combination with a bowel management program. In the presence of a severely denervated pelvic floor, physiotherapeutic techniques rarely give rise to a satisfactory and long-lasting response. Obvious external sphincter defects and patients who failed medical management are treated surgically. Many injuries of the external sphincter can be treated by direct sphincter repair. If patients with intact external sphincters are unresponsive to medical measures, descending perineum and resultant idiopathic fecal incontinence will improve by radio-frequency delivery, sacral nerve stimulation, or postanal plication. Patients with complex neurologic disorders or extensive sphincter defects or who have undergone previous unsuccessful attempts at repair of the puborectalis itself should be considered for dynamic gracilis plastic or an artificial sphincter.

Indexed as

AgedAnal CanalAntidepressive AgentsAntidiarrhealsArtificial OrgansBiofeedback, PsychologyColostomyDiagnosis, DifferentialElectric Stimulation TherapyFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceAntidepressive AgentsAntidiarrheals

Identifiers

PMID15258748
OpenAlexW2414617927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.