Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15258286›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2004

Recombinant poxvirus boosting of DNA-primed rhesus monkeys augments peak but not memory T lymphocyte responses.

Sampa Santra, Dan H Barouch, Birgit Korioth-Schmitz, Carol I Lord, Georgia R Krivulka, Faye Yu, Margaret H Beddall, Darci A Gorgone, Michelle A Lifton, Ayako Miura and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Sampa SantraDivision of Viral Pathogenesis, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Dan H Barouch
Birgit Korioth-Schmitz
Carol I Lord
Georgia R Krivulka
Faye Yu
Margaret H Beddall
Darci A Gorgone
Michelle A Lifton
Ayako Miura
Valerie Philippon
Kelledy Manson
Phillip D Markham
John Parrish
Marcelo J Kuroda
Jörn E Schmitz
Rebecca S Gelman
John W Shiver
David C Montefiori
Dennis Panicali
Norman L Letvin

Funding

RECOMBINANT POXVIRUS ELICITED CYTOTOXIC T LYMPHOCYTES IN MONKEYSP01AI026507 · NIAID · THERION BIOLOGICS CORPORATION · PI PANICALI, DENNIS L · 1998 to 2003
$7.0M
BINDING OF HIV PEPTIDES TO CLASS II MHC ON HUMAN CELLSR01AI030033 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PERNIS, BENVENUTO G · 1990 to 1992
–
VACCINE TRIALS IN MACAQUES WITH VACCINIA-SIV RECOMBINANTSU01AI026507 · NIAID · THERION BIOLOGICS CORPORATION · PI PANICALI, DENNIS L · 1989 to 1998
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI-15430NIAID NIH HHS AI-26507NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI015430NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030033NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI026507NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI026507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although a consensus has emerged that an HIV vaccine should elicit a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response, the characteristics of an effective vaccine-induced T lymphocyte response remain unclear. We explored this issue in the simian human immunodeficiency virus/rhesus monkey model in the course of assessing the relative immunogenicity of vaccine regimens that included a cytokine-augmented plasmid DNA prime and a boost with DNA or recombinant pox vectors. Recombinant vaccinia virus, recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA), and recombinant fowlpox were comparable in their immunogenicity. Moreover, whereas the magnitude of the peak vaccine-elicited T lymphocyte responses in the recombinant pox virus-boosted monkeys was substantially greater than that seen in the monkeys immunized with plasmid DNA alone, the magnitudes of recombinant pox boosted CTL responses decayed rapidly and were comparable to those of the DNA-alone-vaccinated monkeys by the time of viral challenge. Consistent with these comparable memory T cell responses, the clinical protection seen in all groups of experimentally vaccinated monkeys was similar. This study, therefore, indicates that the steady-state memory, rather than the peak effector vaccine-elicited T lymphocyte responses, may be the critical immune correlate of protection for a CTL-based HIV vaccine.

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryAnimalsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayLymphocyte CountMacaca mulattaPolymerase Chain ReactionPoxviridaeRestriction MappingRNA, ViralT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicVaccinia virusViral VaccinesRNA, ViralViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID15258286
PMCPMC503745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.