Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15258095›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2004

Phase and antigenic variation in bacteria.

Marjan W van der Woude, Andreas J Bäumler

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 377 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
377citing papers in PubMed
23.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

377 citing papers in PubMed, 773 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Genomic analysis ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Gene regulation inMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

317 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marjan W van der WoudeDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, 202A Johnson Pavilion, 3610 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6076, USA. mvdwoude@mail.med.upenn.edu
Andreas J Bäumler
Texas A&M University System · US

Funding

Virulence Factors of SalmonellaR01AI044170 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI BAUMLER, ANDREAS J · 1999 to 2022
$8.5M
Analysis of Salmonella typhimurium Fimbrial AntigensR01AI040124 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI BAUMLER, ANDREAS J · 2002 to 2011
$3.6M
S TYPHIMURIUM ADHESION TO PEYERS PATCHESR29AI040124 · NIAID · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI BAUMLER, ANDREAS J · 1997 to 2001
$207k
NIAID NIH HHS AI 40124NIAID NIH HHS AI 44170NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI040124NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI044170NIAID NIH HHS R29 AI040124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase and antigenic variation result in a heterogenic phenotype of a clonal bacterial population, in which individual cells either express the phase-variable protein(s) or not, or express one of multiple antigenic forms of the protein, respectively. This form of regulation has been identified mainly, but by no means exclusively, for a wide variety of surface structures in animal pathogens and is implicated as a virulence strategy. This review provides an overview of the many bacterial proteins and structures that are under the control of phase or antigenic variation. The context is mainly within the role of the proteins and variation for pathogenesis, which reflects the main body of literature. The occurrence of phase variation in expression of genes not readily recognizable as virulence factors is highlighted as well, to illustrate that our current knowledge is incomplete. From recent genome sequence analysis, it has become clear that phase variation may be more widespread than is currently recognized, and a brief discussion is included to show how genome sequence analysis can provide novel information, as well as its limitations. The current state of knowledge of the molecular mechanisms leading to phase variation and antigenic variation are reviewed, and the way in which these mechanisms form part of the general regulatory network of the cell is addressed. Arguments both for and against a role of phase and antigenic variation in immune evasion are presented and put into new perspective by distinguishing between a role in bacterial persistence in a host and a role in facilitating evasion of cross-immunity. Finally, examples are presented to illustrate that phase-variable gene expression should be taken into account in the development of diagnostic assays and in the interpretation of experimental results and epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

Antigenic VariationGene Expression Regulation, BacterialAmino Acid SequenceBacteriaBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceHumansMolecular Sequence DataBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15258095
PMCPMC452554
OpenAlexW2139295688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.