Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15257380›Full record

Trial reportDer Nervenarzt2004

[Multimodal computed tomography in acute cerebral infarction. Experience with a standardized protocol in 100 patients].

R Handschu, S Fateh-Moghadam, E Klotz, A Schmid, B Stemper, J G Heckmann, W J Huk, B Neundörfer, B F Tomandl

Abstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Der Nervenarzt, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Imaging in acute stroke.European radiology · 2005
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R HandschuNeurologische Klinik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. rene.handschu@neuro.imed.uni-erlangen.de
S Fateh-Moghadam
E Klotz
A Schmid
B Stemper
J G Heckmann
W J Huk
B Neundörfer
B F Tomandl
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEMedical Solutions · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is the standard method of brain imaging in acute stroke. To an experienced examiner, nonenhanced CT will exclude hemorrhage and may indicate early ischemic signs. Reliable description of an ischemic area and the underlying vascular disease is not possible in the acute phase but is possible, particularly within the first hours, when therapeutic decisions on matters such as systemic thrombolysis are to be made. For such rapid decision-making, imaging must provide more information. Novel, contrast-enhanced CT techniques can provide this information. Perfusion CT (CTP) can show brain perfusion, allowing one to distinguish between reversible and irreversible damage in an ischemic area. Also, CT angiography (CTA) can detect occlusion or stenosis in the relevant vasculature. Using a modern, multislice CT scanner, it is now possible to combine these modalities of imaging. In a fast protocol for emergency evaluation, all three methods can be performed and evaluated to provide the crucial information within 15 min. In the first 102 patients examined within 6 h of symptom onset using this protocol, multimodal CT contributed substantially to therapeutic decisions, even though there are some limitations in these methods.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedBrainCerebral InfarctionDiagnosis, DifferentialEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care ManagementReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID15257380
OpenAlexW1251780533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.